Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor

Date of article: 11/06/2020

Daily News of: 12/06/2020

Country:  EUROPE

Author:

Article language: en

Link https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2020-06/cp200072en.pdf

Languages bg es cs da de et el en fr hr it lv lt hu mt nl pl pt ro sk sl fi sv

Court of Justice of the European Union

PRESS RELEASE No 72/20

Luxembourg, 11 June 2020
Judgment in Case C-88/19 Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor v TM and Others
 
The strict protection of animal species provided for in the Habitats Directive also extends to specimens that leave their natural habitat and stray into human settlements 
The capture and relocation of a wolf found in a village can therefore be justified only where they form the subject of a derogation adopted by the competent national authority
In its judgment in Alianța pentru combaterea abuzurilor (C-88/19), delivered on 11 June 2020, the Court ruled on the territorial scope of the system of strict protection of certain animal species provided for in Article 12(1) of Directive 92/43 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora1 (‘the Habitats Directive’). In that connection, the Court confirmed that this system of strict protection laid down in respect of the species listed in point (a) of Annex IV to that directive, such as the wolf, also applies to specimens that leave their natural habitat and stray into human settlements.
In 2016, employees of an animal protection association, accompanied by a veterinary surgeon, captured and relocated, without prior authorisation, a wolf which had been present on the property of a resident of a village situated between two major sites that are protected under the Habitats Directive. The relocation of the captured wolf to a nature reserve did not, however, go to plan and the wolf managed to escape into a nearby forest. A criminal complaint was filed in respect of offences associated with the unsafe capture and relocation of a wolf. In the context of those criminal proceedings, the referring court is unclear as to whether the protection provisions contained in the Habitats Directive apply to the capture of wild wolves on the outskirts of a town or city or on the territory of a local authority.

 

Read more