Communication failures led to wrong treatment that left five-year-old girl traumatised

Date of article: 05/06/2026

Daily News of: 12/06/2026

Country:  United Kingdom

Author:

Article language: en

Effective communication is a critical tool in preventing harm. This has been highlighted in a case where a child was left bleeding and in severe pain after being wrongly prescribed a vaginal pessary following an appointment with a physician associate (PA). 

The case exposed multiple failures in the five-year-old’s care and led to her mother being questioned about possible sexual abuse.  The practice has committed to learn from this complaint and strengthen its systems to prevent the same mistake happening again.

The value of effective communication for public services and its importance in maintaining citizens’ trust and confidence forms a central part of the long-term strategy of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) published in April.  

There was no discussion between the PA and GP before the GP authorised the prescription based on the PA’s recommendation. There was also no questioning of the prescription by the pharmacy that dispensed it.  

The girl was taken to a GP practice in East Midlands in March 2023 with itching and vaginal discharge. A PA suspected thrush and recommended a Clotrimazole vaginal pessary and cream. Her mother, who believed her child was being treated by a GP, questioned the treatment and the size of the pessary, but was reassured that it was appropriate. 

In 2024, the Government commissioned the Leng Review to address concerns about the safety and rapid deployment of PAs and Anaesthesia Associates (AAs) within the NHS. Following the publication of that review last year, the Government accepted its recommendations, including about improving the identification and supervision of PAs. They are in the process of implementing them.  

After the mother administered the pessary, a treatment which should not be given to a pre-pubescent child, the child began to bleed and scream in pain. Her mother described the experience as deeply distressing and psychologically traumatising for them both. The mother says the cream also burnt her daughter’s skin. 

At a later appointment with an out-of-hours doctor, the girl, still in pain and distressed, asked the doctor not to examine her internally. Combined with her symptoms, this led the GP to raise concerns about possible sexual abuse and to have discussions with safeguarding services about this.  

As part of those discussions, a consultant explained that the symptoms were caused by the pessary and cream, not sexual abuse. While the out-of-hours doctor acted appropriately, the mother said the experience was distressing, embarrassing, and further added to her trauma. 

An investigation by PHSO found failings by all involved. The practice inappropriately prescribed the treatment as a pessary should only be given to someone who is sexually active and the pharmacy did not do the necessary clinical checks before dispensing it. 

Rebecca Hilsenrath, Chief Executive Officer of PHSO, said, 

This is a deeply troubling case in which a child suffered physically and psychologically and was left traumatised by her experience. What makes this all the more concerning is that it could so easily have been avoided by better communication between the professionals involved in caring for this young girl. 

 

“The breakdown in communication meant that the checks and balances designed to make sure patients are treated appropriately and kept safe were not followed. Poor communication is a recurring theme in our investigations and the NHS must make sure it operates with candour and clarity both between professionals and in relation to patients and their families. 

 

“I welcome the Government’s commitment through the Leng Review to providing clarity and structure around these roles for the benefit of patients, PAs and doctors.” 

PHSO’s investigation found that the prescription given was not appropriate as the child’s symptoms were consistent with vulvovaginitis, not thrush, and a pessary tablet should not be given to a five-year-old.  

PAs do not have prescribing rights and their work must be supervised by a doctor who signs the prescription following a discussion. No discussion took place between the GP and PA. Pharmacists should contact the prescriber when there are queries relating to a prescription. There is no evidence that the pharmacy did this. 

The Ombudsman recommended that the practice and pharmacy write to the girl’s mother to apologise for their failings and acknowledge the impact on her and her daughter.  

PHSO also recommended both organisations make service changes to ensure this does not happen again, that the practice pay the girl’s mother £1,000 and that the pharmacy pay her £500. Both organisations have complied with our recommendations.

The practice has taken action to strengthen and improve its processes. It introduced an electronic prescribing alert to flag intravaginal pessary prescriptions for children, requiring additional review before authorisation. It also carried out a review of the scope of practice for the PA, particularly in relation to the assessment and treatment of children, taking into account current professional guidance.  

The PA and GP involved underwent additional training to reinforce appropriate prescribing standards and supervision requirements. Processes at the practice have also been strengthened to ensure that supervisory discussions are clearly documented before prescriptions are signed. 

The girl’s mother, 38, said, 

I had huge guilt for doing what the PA, who I thought was a GP, told me and feeling as if I had inflicted this trauma on my daughter.   

 

“But I trusted what the doctor told me. How are we meant to trust healthcare professionals now? The prescription went through three professionals and no one picked it up or questioned why this was being given to a child. 

 

“My daughter is neurodivergent, so it has been even harder for her to move on from the harm this caused. This deeply affected her and added to the struggles she already faces every day, I don’t think she will ever move on from it. 

 

“I have three neurodivergent children and have been battling for them to receive the right education services they need, and then I had to deal with this. It was a breaking point for me and caused so much stress for the whole family.”  

Read more

Council left domestic abuse survivor and child without a home by ignoring its own legal duties

Date of article: 21/05/2026

Daily News of: 26/05/2026

Country:  United Kingdom - England

Author:

Article language: en

South Gloucestershire Council turned away a domestic abuse survivor and her young children when they urgently needed help, after fundamentally misapplying the law designed to protect victims, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has found.

The mother fled domestic abuse in 2023 and moved with her child to a refuge. When told she would need to leave the refuge, she approached South Gloucestershire Council for homelessness help. Despite a formal risk assessment showing she faced severe and escalating danger, the council refused to help because she did not have a local connection to the area.

The council considered whether the mother could live in a different area near her family. This was despite being told the mother had applied for a non-molestation order against her former partner who had travelled there to try to find her.

South Gloucestershire then referred the mother back to the area she had fled, telling her she would be safe if housed "three miles" from unsafe addresses, without any basis in law or guidance for this approach.

When the mother's support worker repeatedly challenged the council's decisions, citing the relevant law and the Government's own Homelessness Code of Guidance, the council dismissed the challenges and insisted the guidance did not apply.

The council then closed the mother's case without resolving her housing situation, leaving her with no accommodation and no clear way of getting help.

Amerdeep Clarke, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said:

"This vulnerable family sought help from South Gloucestershire Council and the risks she faced were clearly documented. Yet the council turned her away, sent her back towards danger, and then simply closed her file.

“What concerns me most is that these decisions were not made in error by a single officer acting alone. They were made and maintained with managerial awareness, in the face of accurate challenge. That suggests this is not about one bad decision, it may reflect a wider misapplication of the law that could be affecting other domestic abuse survivors right now, in South Gloucestershire and potentially elsewhere.

"No victim of domestic abuse should face the prospect of being referred back to the area they fled. The law is clear on this and councils must understand and follow it.

"I am pleased that South Gloucestershire Council has accepted our recommendations and taken steps to put things right for this family. Its commitment to train housing staff should hopefully ensure that no other family is let down in this way.

"This case should serve as a wake-up call for every council in the country. Getting this wrong does not just cause distress. It puts lives at risk."

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman remedies injustice and shares learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. In this case the council has agreed to apologise to the mother and pay her £1,000 in recognition of the significant distress caused.

The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve processes for the wider public. In this case the council has agreed to provide training or guidance to housing staff to ensure they understand their duties to people at risk of domestic abuse.

Read more

Ombudsman's findings - May 2026

Date of article: 25/05/2026

Daily News of: 26/05/2026

Country:  United Kingdom - Scotland

Author:

Article language: en

Since March, we have published 31 decisions of full investigations.

52% of our recently published investigations show evidence of poor complaints handling. These issues can have fundamental, negative impacts on complainants’ lives and wellbeing.

In one case published this month (202401974), a family made life changing decisions based on uncertainties around a potentially terminal cancer diagnosis. They then had to go through a lengthy complaints process, adding unnecessary strain at a deeply distressing time, despite clear opportunities to identify failings much earlier.

These cases demonstrate both the severity and breadth of the issues we handle, with findings ranging from misdiagnosis and delays in healthcare to the administrative handling of benefit payments.

In another case (202401604), we found failings in how Midlothian Council managed the end of an adoptive placement due to irreconcilable behavioural difficulties and a breakdown in the relationship. The findings included weaknesses in the accuracy of assessment reports, information sharing between authorities, and the involvement of the adoptive parent in ongoing care planning.

Our recommendations focused on improving decision making and governance, including ensuring that reports are balanced, evidence-based, and fully reflect all relevant information, and that clear processes are in place for case transfer, independent oversight, and post-placement review.
 

This case highlights the role our work plays in improving how services make and record decisions affecting vulnerable children, helping to ensure greater transparency, accountability, and better outcomes in future.

Read our latest findings

Receive news straight to your inbox

Read more

London council found at fault twice for failing children with special needs who attend schools outside its area

Date of article: 14/05/2026

Daily News of: 20/05/2026

Country:  United Kingdom - England

Author:

Article language: en

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman has raised concerns about the support provided to Hounslow children with special educational needs who are schooled out of borough after two complaints were upheld in quick succession.

In one case, a primary school girl with autism and complex special educational needs, whose Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan said she needed speech and language and occupational therapies, received neither for two full school terms.

Throughout the family’s complaint, the council never made it clear that it had a legal duty to ensure the girl gets the therapy she needed in her current school. The family thought she could only get therapy provision if she moved to a school within the council’s area.

The lack of information and advice from the council led the family to decide that moving their daughter was the only way she could receive the therapy she needed. The move led to the girl, who had been happy and settled at her original school, showing behaviours that her family had never seen before.

Having realised that moving their daughter to a different school was a mistake, the family appealed. By that point, her original, out-of-borough school place had been given to another child. In the end, the girl will be returning to her first school from September 2026.

The Ombudsman has also found the same gap in provision in another recent complaint about Hounslow council. The law is clear: if a child's support plan says they need therapy, the council must make sure they get it, no matter which school they attend. Hounslow council has not been meeting this basic legal responsibility.

Amerdeep Clarke, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said:

"This case is a stark reminder of what can go wrong when a council loses sight of its responsibilities to children educated outside its boundaries. A child with complex special educational needs missed vital therapy provision for two whole terms, not because it could not be arranged, but because the council did not have the right systems in place to make it happen.

"I want every council in the country to look at this case and ask whether they are confident they have proper oversight of the children in their area who are educated in out-of-area placements. Are the right arrangements in place? Do staff understand the council's legal duties? Are there systems to check that provision is actually being delivered?

"Children with SEND are amongst the most vulnerable in our communities, and the impact of getting this wrong, on their development, their wellbeing, and their families, can be profound and long-lasting. Effective scrutiny and oversight of local SEND services is not a bureaucratic exercise; it is how councils make sure every child gets the education they are entitled to."

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman remedies injustice and shares learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. In this case the council should apologise to the family and pay them £1,700.

Article date: 14 May 2026

Read more

Our quarterly newsletter: January - May

Date of article: 19/05/2026

Daily News of: 20/05/2026

Country:  United Kingdom - Wales

Author:

Article language: en

A word from the Ombudsman

Welcome to the 10th edition of our newsletter.

In terms of the volume of our casework, we have just wrapped up the busiest year on record. Although we will publish the details of our complaints service performance in our Annual Report later in the year, I can already signal that we have never seen that many new complaints, with the number of complaints closed likewise far beyond our performance in the previous years.

In the meantime, as we prepare our Annual Report, we include in this newsletter updates on some of our recent public interest reports and outcomes of our Code of Conduct referrals. Our own initiative work has progressed considerably over the past few months – we will be covering our own initiative investigations into social housing disrepair, damp and mould, as well as our other current investigations and our follow-up report into carers’ needs assessments. It’s a busy time for us in this department!

As we enter the new financial year, we also mark a special point in the history of the office. It is now 20 years since the first Public Services Ombudsman for Wales took the post. It’s a great opportunity to take stock of the impact we have delivered for the people of Wales over the last two decades and appreciate how our powers have changed to not only deliver justice to individuals but also support systemic improvement of services. We will be outlining our plans for marking this special year further this newsletter.

However, as we mark the 20th anniversary of the office, our eyes are firmly on the future. We are also delighted to publish today our new Strategic Plan 2026-29. It comes at an important time for our office. Demand for our service continues to grow, while expectations of public services, and of the Ombudsman, are changing. At the same time, many people still face barriers when raising concerns or seeking justice, and long‑standing issues in public services can require more systemic solutions. Our Plan responds to these challenges with a renewed focus on impact, accessibility and improvement. I want to thank all who took time to contributed to our public consultation on the Plan and helped to shape it. We can’t wait to get to work!

Read more

Active facets

Link to the Ombudsman Daily News archives from 2002 to 20 October 2011