Public Defender and UNICEF Representative Sign Memorandum of Cooperation

Date of article: 31/07/2026

Daily News of: 31/07/2026

Country:  Georgia

Author:

Article language: en

On July 31, 2026, the Public Defender of Georgia, Levan Ioseliani, and the Representative of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) in Georgia, Isabella Castrogiovanni, signed a Memorandum of Cooperation.

The Memorandum is based on the long-standing partnership of the parties and aims to continue and further deepen the existing cooperation in the field of protection of children's rights, as well as to determine the main directions of future cooperation.

The cooperation includes support for the thematic monitoring of children's rights, strengthening of the capacity of the Public Defender's Office of Georgia, raising public awareness of children's rights and protection mechanisms, as well as joint activities in the areas of research, advocacy, knowledge and practice sharing, which will contribute to the development of child-friendly and inclusive approaches and strengthening of the protection of children's rights in the country.

On March 5, 2026, the Public Defender of Georgia and the acting Representative of the United Nations Children's Fund in Georgia also signed a joint work plan for 2026. The work plan defines the priorities and activities to be implemented during the year, while the Memorandum of Understanding creates a broader and long-term framework for the partnership between the parties.

Read more

Heat must not jeopardise people’s dignity, health and safety

Date of article: 30/07/2026

Daily News of: 31/07/2026

Country:  Slovenia

Author:

Article language: en

The Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia (the Ombudsman) has once again received several complaints this summer highlighting inadequate conditions caused by high temperatures in various institutions. Based on these complaints and as part of the activities of the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM), the Ombudsman has already assessed conditions in some institutions and taken temperature readings. He will conduct several more such visits in the coming days.

The Ombudsman once again urges the management of these institutions and all other responsible authorities to consistently monitor conditions during heatwaves in facilities where people are living who are unable to secure more suitable conditions for themselves, and to take timely measures to protect their health and dignity.

Findings to date indicate that high temperatures continue to pose a serious burden in many cases for residents of nursing homes, patients in hospitals and psychiatric institutions, incarcerated individuals, and other people in institutional care, as well as for staff. It is particularly concerning when people, because of their health condition, age, disability, deprivation of liberty or other circumstances, are unable to secure more suitable living conditions for themselves. The risk of inadequate living conditions is particularly high in older, dilapidated nursing homes and other facilities that are not equipped with adequate cooling and ventilation systems. It is the responsibility of the State to ensure that institutions have appropriate regulations, standards and financial resources to provide adequate living conditions.

The Ombudsman emphasises that ensuring adequate living conditions during heatwaves is not merely a matter of comfort, but of respect for human dignity, human rights and the right to a healthy environment, particularly for older people, patients, persons with disabilities, children and other vulnerable groups. The State and public service providers must ensure effective measures to protect the health and dignity of people entrusted to their care or deprived of their liberty. In this regard, merely complying with internal rules in a formal manner is not sufficient. The Ombudsman has already drawn the attention of the competent authorities to cases where internal rules are applied too rigidly, with air conditioning systems being switched on only once predetermined temperature thresholds have been reached—for example, after several consecutive days of outdoor temperatures above 30°C. Such rules must not take precedence over the obligation to ensure safe and humane living conditions in a timely manner. The Ombudsman has therefore reminded the competent authorities of the need to monitor actual indoor temperatures and act without delay where necessary.

Based on the complaints received, the Ombudsman also inspected conditions in the psychiatric wards of the University Medical Centre Maribor. During an unannounced visit on 10 July 2026, he recorded temperatures above 26°C. During the recent heatwave, staff in some wards also recorded temperatures of up to 31°C and, in one ward, as high as 36°C. The Ombudsman therefore requested clarification from the hospital's management regarding the measures already taken and those planned to ensure more appropriate living conditions. He also drew attention to the recommendations he had made during previous NPM visits concerning the provision of adequate cooling.

The Ombudsman has been drawing attention to the problem of excessively high temperatures in institutions for many years. Within the scope of his mandate, he regularly monitors conditions in hospitals, social welfare institutions, prisons, police detention facilities and other institutions where people cannot choose the conditions in which they live. Despite some improvements, problems during heatwaves continue to recur, which is why the Ombudsman expects more systematic and long-term solutions.

For many people living in institutions, summer brings not only greater exposure to heat but also increased loneliness. Because of the holiday period, there are fewer visits from family members and volunteers, and in some places fewer organised activities. The Ombudsman therefore urges the management of these institutions to pay particular attention, even during the summer months, to maintaining social contact, conversations and other forms of support that make a significant contribution to people's quality of life and mental well-being.

However, high temperatures do not affect only people living in care institutions. The Ombudsman also emphasises the importance of ensuring safe and healthy working conditions for all workers, particularly those working outdoors or in environments where they are exposed to high temperatures. Employers must take appropriate protective measures in a timely manner, adapt working arrangements to weather conditions, and provide employees with conditions that enable them to carry out their work safely and with dignity.

Ensuring adequate living and working conditions, effective protection from extreme heat, and maintaining social connections during periods of hot weather are not merely matters of care standards and work organisation; they are fundamental to respect for human dignity and human rights.


 
Read more

Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram took the oath of office before the Sejm

Date of article: 29/07/2026

Daily News of: 31/07/2026

Country:  Poland

Author:

Article language: en

Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram took the oath of office before the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, formally assuming the office of the Commissioner for Human Rights. She succeeded Marcin Wiącek, whose term of office ended on 23 July 2026. The Commissioner’s term of office lasts five years.

Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram was appointed Commissioner for Human Rights by the Sejm of the Republic of Poland on 17 July. The Senate of the Republic of Poland approved her appointment on 22 July 2026. Pursuant to the Act on the Commissioner for Human Rights, before assuming office the Commissioner is required to take an oath before the Sejm.

“I solemnly swear that, in carrying out the duties entrusted to me as Commissioner for Human Rights, I will remain faithful to the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, safeguard human and civil rights and freedoms, and be guided by the law as well as by the principles of social coexistence and justice. I swear that I will discharge the duties entrusted to me impartially, with the utmost diligence and care, that I will uphold the dignity of the office entrusted to me, and that I will preserve legally protected confidentiality.”

Commissioner for Human Rights Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram took the oath during the sitting of the Sejm.

Following the oath-taking ceremony, Speaker of the Sejm Włodzimierz Czarzasty presented Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram with the resolution of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland on the appointment of the Commissioner for Human Rights.

Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram

Sylwia Gregorczyk-Abram is an attorney-at-law, social activist, and human rights defender. For over twenty years, she has been actively involved in promoting and protecting civil rights and freedoms. Since 2010, she has been a member of the Warsaw Bar Association. She was born on 19 November 1982 in Garwolin.

She graduated from the Faculty of Law and Administration at the University of Warsaw. She also completed the American Law Studies Center and postgraduate studies in medical law, bioethics, and the sociology of medicine at the University of Warsaw, as well as postgraduate studies in fiscal criminal law and business law at Jagiellonian University.

Since the beginning of her professional career, she has been dedicated to the protection of human rights. She has represented individuals particularly vulnerable to violations of their rights and freedoms, including victims of violence, persons with disabilities, individuals affected by discrimination, victims of human trafficking, and people seeking international protection. She has also been actively engaged in safeguarding freedom of expression and freedom of assembly, organizing legal assistance for participants of peaceful protests and civic activists.

A key focus of her work has been the protection of the rule of law and the right to an independent court. In 2017, she co-founded the Free Courts Foundation (Fundacja Wolne Sądy), and a year later, she was one of the initiators of the Justice Defence Committee (Komitet Obrony Sprawiedliwości – KOS). She has led strategic litigation before the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning judicial independence and the right to effective judicial protection. She has represented both citizens and judges subjected to reprisals for defending the principles of the rule of law.

She co-created the Justice 24 project, which documents war crimes committed in Ukraine and supports victims in pursuing their rights. She also chaired the Commission for Investigating the Mechanisms of Repression Against Civil Society Organizations and Social Activists in the years 2015–2023.

For many years, she has been engaged in educational activities. She is the originator and long-serving coordinator of the “Constitution Week” program, co-author of publications and educational materials devoted to human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, and a lecturer for trainee attorneys-at-law.

She is the author and co-author of scholarly publications on the protection of human rights within the European system, the role of the European Court of Human Rights in protecting individuals, the use of preliminary references and strategic litigation in safeguarding citizens’ rights, judicial independence, and the importance of civil society and professional self-governing organizations to the functioning of a democratic state governed by the rule of law.

In recognition of her professional and social activities, she has received numerous distinctions, including the “Pro Bono Lawyer” award, the “Golden Paragraph” award, and the “Meritorious Service to the Bar” distinction.

Read more

Achitz: Gesellschaft nimmt nicht genug Geld für Kinder- und Jugendhilfe in die Hand

Date of article: 31/07/2026

Daily News of: 31/07/2026

Country:  Austria

Author:

Article language: de

Was tun mit Kindern, die Straftaten begehen, aber noch zu jung sind, um strafmündig zu sein? Die Schnellschussvariante, die dann manchmal gefordert wird, kommt aus menschenrechtlicher Sicht gar nicht in Frage, da sind sich Expertinnen und Experten einig. Die Wiener Kinder- und Jugendhilfe (MA 11) geht einen anderen Weg, der aber ebenfalls umstritten ist: Seit Mitte Juli läuft das Pilotprojekt einer „Auszeit-WG“ in Simmering. Kritik kommt von der Volksanwaltschaft und anderen Expert*innen.

Ein Aufenthalt in dem Haus am Stadtrand Wiens kann bis zu zwölf Wochen dauern. Gedacht ist die Maßnahme für Kinder, die wiederholt schwere Taten gesetzt haben. In der Wohngemeinschaft sollen Kinder im Alter von elf bis 13 Jahren betreut werden. Sie haben etwa Delikte wie Raub oder Einbrüche begangen. "Den Kindern sollen Perspektiven eines Auswegs ihrer bisherigen kriminellen Laufbahn aufgezeigt werden und sie sollen durch eine intensive pädagogische Begleitung wieder an positive Entwicklungswege herangeführt werden", betonte Stadträtin Bettina Emmerling.

Achitz: Letzter Schritt wird vor dem ersten gegangen

Die Volksanwaltschaft hat die Idee der Auszeit-WG von Anfang an kritisiert. „Man macht hier den letzten Schritt, bevor man die Schritte vorher macht“, sagt Volksanwalt Bernhard Achitz. Vor einer solchen Maßnahme müssten zunächst alle pädagogischen Mittel ausgeschöpft werden müssten – etwa mehr Betreuungsplätze, bessere psychiatrische Versorgung und zusätzliche Angebote für Kinder mit komplexem Unterstützungsbedarf. Das ist bisher zu wenig geschehen. 

„Die optimalen Standards in der Kinder- und Jugendhilfe werden nicht eingehalten, weil wir als Gesellschaft nicht bereit sind, mehr Geld in die Hand zu nehmen“, sagte Achitz im Gespräch mit der Kronen Zeitung. Die Volksanwaltschaft hat erst vor Kurzem Kinder- und Jugendeinrichtungen als sicheren Ort geprüft. Das Ergebnis: Nur 16 Prozent der stationären Betreuungseinrichtungen seien „sehr sicher“, der Rest weise erhebliche Mängel auf. 

„Alles, was uns bisher über das Konzept der Auszeit-WG bekannt ist, ist nicht gerade dazu geeignet, unsere grundsätzliche Kritik zu entkräften – eher im Gegenteil. Die Volksanwaltschaft wird die praktische Umsetzung im Zuge der präventiven Menschenrechtskontrolle genau im Blick behalten.“

Kritik von renommiertem Kinderpsychiater

Kritik an der Auszeit-WG kommt von Expert*innenseite. Der renommierte forensische Kinder- und Jugendpsychiater Patrick Frottier sieht in einem Konzeptpapier des Trägervereins "gravierende fachliche Mängel". Es entspräche "nicht einmal im Ansatz einem Konzept für eine Einrichtung mit dieser Tragweite", so Frottier, der das Papier auf Anfrage der Austria Presse Agentur (APA) unter die Lupe nahm. Ein ähnliches Fazit fällte der Österreichische Berufsverband der Sozialen Arbeit (OBDS). Und laut APA gibt es unter vorgehaltener Hand auch direkt aus der MA 11 Kritik: Ob ein bis zu zwölfwöchiger Aufenthalt in der geschlossenen Wohngemeinschaft einem Kind bereits eine nachhaltige Verbesserung bringen könne, sei fraglich. 

Read more

Trento, pubblicata la Relazione annuale 2025 del Difensore civico della Provincia autonoma.

Date of article: 28/07/2026

Daily News of: 31/07/2026

Country:  Italy

Author: Italian National Coordination Body of Regional and Autonomous Provinces Ombudsmen

Article language: it

È stata pubblicata sul sito istituzionale del Difensore civico della Provincia autonoma di Trento la Relazione annuale sull’attività svolta nel 2025, documento che offre un quadro completo dell’attività di tutela dei diritti dei cittadini nei confronti della pubblica amministrazione e delle iniziative promosse dall’Ufficio nel corso dell’anno.

La Relazione rappresenta uno strumento fondamentale di trasparenza e di rendicontazione istituzionale, attraverso il quale il Difensore civico riferisce al Consiglio provinciale sull’attività svolta, sulle principali criticità emerse e sulle proposte di miglioramento dell’azione amministrativa.

Nella premessa della Relazione, il Difensore civico della Provincia autonoma di Trento il Dott. Sandro Raimondi, evidenzia come l’esperienza maturata nei primi mesi del proprio mandato abbia confermato quanto i cittadini sentano l’esigenza di un rapporto diretto con le istituzioni, capace di andare oltre gli strumenti digitali e i semplici portali informatici. «Le questioni portate all’attenzione del Difensore civico – osserva – denotano la necessità del cittadino di avere un contatto diretto, una parola di indirizzo, una risposta pressoché immediata, un consiglio, una soluzione». Un richiamo che sottolinea il valore della difesa civica quale presidio di prossimità, ascolto e mediazione tra amministrazione e comunità. (Consiglio Provinciale di Trento)

Nella stessa introduzione viene inoltre riconosciuto come il sistema della pubblica amministrazione trentina sia complessivamente caratterizzato da elevati standard di qualità, pur permanendo alcune criticità riconducibili soprattutto alla crescente complessità del quadro normativo e regolamentare, che rende talvolta più difficile l’applicazione uniforme delle disposizioni da parte degli uffici. (Consiglio Provinciale di Trento)

Il Coordinamento Nazionale dei Difensori Civici delle Regioni e delle Province Autonome accoglie con favore la pubblicazione della Relazione annuale, che costituisce un importante contributo alla diffusione della cultura della buona amministrazione, della legalità e della tutela dei diritti.

La condivisione delle esperienze maturate nei diversi territori rappresenta infatti un patrimonio comune dell’intera rete della difesa civica italiana, favorendo lo scambio di buone pratiche, il confronto istituzionale e il continuo rafforzamento del ruolo del Difensore civico quale garante dei principi di imparzialità, trasparenza e buon andamento dell’azione amministrativa.

Il Coordinamento rinnova i complimenti al collega Difensore civico della Provincia autonoma di Trento e a tutto il personale dell’Ufficio per il lavoro svolto, nella convinzione che relazioni annuali come questa rappresentino un prezioso strumento di conoscenza, riflessione e crescita per l’intero sistema della difesa civica nazionale.

Read more

Link to the Ombudsman Daily News archives from 2002 to 20 October 2011