Présentation du nouveau rapport sur les conditions de détention des femmes au Luxembourg

Date of article: 22/01/2026

Daily News of: 23/01/2026

Country:  Luxembourg

Author:

Article language: fr

Le 19 janvier, l’Ombudsman du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Claudine KONSBRUCK, en sa fonction de Contrôleur externe des lieux privatifs de liberté (CELPL) a présenté son rapport sur les conditions de détention des femmes au Luxembourg. Représentant environ 10 % de la population carcérale, les détenues constituent une population minoritaire et vulnérable, confrontée à des infrastructures insuffisantes, notamment à la plus grande prison du pays où l’absence de séparation entre profils (détenues condamnées, prévenues et mineures) génère des tensions. Dans son rapport, le CELPL dessine plusieurs pistes pour améliorer la situation et invite les responsables à garantir un standard de détention approprié face aux défis présentés.

Le Rapport est disponible via https://www.ombudsman.lu/uploads/RV/RV24%20-%20Rapport.pdf.

Read more

Il Difensore Civico del Lazio nei Centri Anziani: presentato il nuovo progetto regionale

Date of article: 19/01/2026

Daily News of: 23/01/2026

Country:  Italy - Lazio

Author:

Article language: it

l Consiglio regionale l’avvio dell’iniziativa per rafforzare tutela dei diritti, ascolto e dialogo diretto con le persone anziane sul territorio

Difensore Civico Lazio 18 12 2025 03

Si è tenuta giovedì 18 dicembre, presso la Sala Di Carlo del Consiglio regionale del Lazio, la presentazione ufficiale del progetto “Il Difensore Civico nei centri anziani”, la nuova iniziativa regionale dedicata alla tutela dei diritti, all’ascolto attivo e al rafforzamento della vicinanza istituzionale alle persone anziane.

L’incontro, promosso dal Difensore Civico della Regione Lazio Marino Fardelli, ha visto una partecipazione ampia e qualificata delle istituzioni regionali, degli enti locali e delle realtà associative impegnate nei servizi per la terza età, confermando l’interesse e l’attenzione verso un progetto pensato per avvicinare concretamente la difesa civica ai cittadini più maturi.

Dopo l’introduzione del Difensore Civico, sono intervenuti Antonello Aurigemma, Presidente del Consiglio regionale del Lazio e della Conferenza delle Assemblee legislative delle Regioni e delle Province autonome, con un messaggio di saluto, la Segretaria generale del Consiglio regionale Giosy Pierpaola Tomasello e l’Assessore regionale all’Inclusione sociale e Servizi alla persona Massimiliano Maselli.

Hanno inoltre portato il loro contributo Luisa Piacentini, Presidente del CAL Lazio, i sindaci Stefano Bigotti (Vallecorsa) e Marco Colucci (Ceprano), Federica Friggi, delegata ANCI Lazio per le politiche della terza età, e Manuel Magliocchetti, Segretario generale di Federsanità ANCI Lazio.

Nel corso dell’evento è stata presentata anche la brochure informativa del progetto, che accompagnerà gli incontri del Difensore Civico nei centri anziani del territorio regionale, con l’obiettivo di rendere più accessibili informazioni, strumenti di tutela e percorsi di risoluzione delle problematiche legate ai servizi pubblici e ai rapporti con le amministrazioni.

A conclusione dei lavori, il Difensore Civico Marino Fardelli ha sottolineato il valore strategico dell’iniziativa:
«Con questo progetto compiamo un passo concreto verso un’amministrazione più comprensibile e più giusta. Andare nei centri anziani significa intercettare bisogni reali, prevenire conflitti e rafforzare il rapporto di fiducia tra cittadini e istituzioni, valorizzando l’esperienza e il ruolo sociale delle persone anziane».

L’iniziativa “Il Difensore Civico nei centri anziani” si avvia ora alla fase operativa, con un calendario di incontri sul territorio regionale, confermandosi come uno strumento innovativo di partecipazione, tutela dei diritti e inclusione attiva.

 

Read more

Massenpetition zur Pflegekammer NRW

Date of article: 13/01/2026

Daily News of: 23/01/2026

Country:  Germany - North Rhine-Westphalia

Author:

Article language: de

Den Petitionsausschuss erreichen immer wieder Eingaben zum Thema Pflegekammer NRW. Diese Eingaben richten sich insbesondere gegen die Errichtung der Pflegekammer NRW, gegen die Pflichtmitgliedschaft oder gegen die Höhe der Pflichtbeiträge.

 

Der Petitionsausschuss dankt an dieser Stelle nochmals allen Petentinnen und Petenten, dass sie sich ihrem gesellschaftlich wichtigen Beruf mit großem Engagement widmen und darüber hinaus auch nach Wegen suchen, ihre Kritik an der Pflegekammer zu adressieren.

Der Ausschuss nimmt insbesondere den Wunsch nach Diskurs wahr und möchte erneut darauf hinweisen, dass er nach Verabschiedung des entsprechenden Gesetzes nicht mehr der richtige Adressat für die genannten Anliegen ist.

Eingaben zur Pflegekammer haben in den vergangenen Jahren mehrfach parlamentarische Petitionsverfahren durchlaufen.

In den Jahren 2020 und 2021 ging beim Petitionsausschuss des Landtags Nordrhein-Westfalen eine große Anzahl an Eingaben gegen die Errichtung einer Pflegekammer Nordrhein-Westfalen ein. Diese überwiegend gleichlautenden Schreiben wurden gemäß § 97 Abs. 7 der Geschäftsordnung des Landtags Nordrhein-Westfalen als eine Petition (Massenpetition) behandelt. Dies ist ein übliches parlamentarisches Verfahren, das dem Ausschuss ermöglicht, bei inhaltlich gleichgerichteten Eingaben eine einheitliche Prüfung und Beratung vorzunehmen.

Die Landesregierung (Ministerium für Arbeit, Gesundheit und Soziales) hat gemäß dem üblichen Verfahren in einer schriftlichen Stellungnahme Stellung zu den vorgetragenen Bedenken genommen. Diese Stellungnahme ist auf der Internetseite des Landtags öffentlich einsehbar.

Die Petition wurde in der Sitzung des Petitionsausschusses am 31.08.2021 beraten und gemäß § 99 der Geschäftsordnung des Landtags Nordrhein-Westfalen dem Ausschuss für Arbeit, Gesundheit und Soziales (AGS) als Material überwiesen. Der AGS hat die Thematik u.a. in seiner Sitzung am 29.09.2021 sowie im Verlauf in weiteren Sitzungen ausführlich behandelt. Damit ist die bis zu diesem Zeitpunkt geäußerte Kritik, die sich gegen die Pflegekammer als solche (Errichtung, Mitgliedschaft, Beitragspflicht etc.) richtete, in die parlamentarische Willensbildung eingeflossen.

Darüber hinaus erreichen den Ausschuss derzeit regelmäßig Schreiben, in denen um Auskunft nach der Gesamtzahl der eingegangenen Schreiben in den Jahren 2020 und 2021 gegen die Pflegekammer als solche gebeten wird.

Die massenhaften und in der Regel wortgleichen Eingaben wurden ab einem gewissem Zeitpunkt nicht mehr individuell erfasst. Anders als beispielsweise beim Petitionsverfahren des Bundestages bietet das Petitionsverfahren beim Landtag Nordrhein-Westfalen kein Verfahren der öffentlichen Petition per Mitzeichnung und Quorum mit einer bestimmten Mindesteingabezahl an. Insofern geht die Annahme, dass eine bestimmte Anzahl von inhaltsgleichen Petitionen ein anderes als das zuvor erläuterte Petitionsverfahren des Landtags in Gang gesetzt hätte (z.B. eine öffentliche Aussprache zum Inhalt der Petition), fehl. Vielmehr wird jede Petition – unabhängig von der Zahl ihrer Unterstützerinnen und Unterstützer – mit der gleichen Sorgfalt bearbeitet, in einer nichtöffentlichen Sitzung beraten und auf der Grundlage eines Konsensprinzips einstimmig beschlossen. 

Der Vollständigkeit halber weist der Petitionsausschuss darauf hin, dass es sich bei Petitionsverfahren um parlamentarische Vorgänge handelt, bei denen kein Anspruch auf Akteneinsicht nach dem Informationsfreiheitsgesetz besteht. Ein Anspruch auf nachträgliche Beschaffung der gewünschten Information der genauen Anzahl der Petitionen besteht ebenfalls nicht.

Der Ausschuss weist zur Vermeidung von Missverständnissen bei an ihn adressierten formelhaft verfassten sogenannten Widersprüchen zudem ausdrücklich darauf hin, dass das Petitionsverfahren ein parlamentarisches Verfahren ist. Es findet außerhalb der förmlichen Verwaltungs- und Rechtsmittelverfahren statt. Das bedeutet, dass Rechtsmittel und Rechtsbehelfe (z.B. Widerspruch, Einspruch, Klage) nicht durch das Einreichen einer Petition ersetzt werden. 

Der Petitionsausschuss wird daher auf der Grundlage seiner Geschäftsordnung auch künftig Schreiben, die allein einen Widerspruch zur Mitgliedschaft bei der Pflegekammer oder eine Ablehnung der Entrichtung von Mitgliedsbeiträgen beinhalten, weiterhin als Bestandteil dieser bereits beschlossenen Massenpetition ansehen, nicht individuell beraten und nicht weiterleiten. Diese Schreiben sind an die Pflegekammer NRW, Alte Landstraße 104, 40489 Düsseldorf, zu adressieren.

Read more

Public Defender Meets with Life-Sentenced Prisoners in Ksani Penitentiary Establishment No. 15

Date of article: 21/01/2026

Daily News of: 23/01/2026

Country:  Georgia

Author:

Article language: en

On January 21, 2026, the Public Defender of Georgia, Levan Ioseliani, visited Ksani Penitentiary Establishment No. 15 and met with life-sentenced prisoners.

The Public Defender presented the prisoners with a special report, which analyzes legislation and practice of early release and administration of justice for life-sentenced prisoners.

They also discussed legislation and protection of human rights in penitentiary institutions.

The Public Defender of Georgia will continue to actively supervise the protection of the rights of prisoners, including life-sentenced prisoners.

Read more

(EO) Speech: Gender equality in public institutions

Date of article: 13/01/2026

Daily News of: 23/01/2026

Country:  EUROPE

Author:

Article language: en

Speech - Speaker Teresa Anjinho - City Madrid - Country Spain - Date Tuesday | 13 January 2026

Good morning.

Let me begin by thanking the President of the Spanish Court of Auditors, Enriqueta Chicano Jávega, for inviting me to your meeting. It is an honour to be here and to mark this important milestone with you: for the first time, 40% of the European Union’s audit institutions are chaired by women.

As European Ombudswoman, I cooperate closely with various other oversight bodies in the EU, including the European Court of Auditors, so I have a strong appreciation for the work your institutions do in ensuring accountability and preventing corruption.

Having forty percent of supreme audit institutions in Europe now chaired by women is an important step on our collective journey towards true gender equality, a journey we share with the generations of courageous and inspirational women that have come before us.

I am thinking of women such as Clara Campoamor whose advocacy resulted in Spanish women getting the vote; Aurora Teixeira de Castro, a similarly impressive lawyer from my own homeland, who tirelessly highlighted the lesser legal standing that women used to have in Portugal; or Simone Veil, the European Parliament’s first female president.

But I am also thinking of personal heroes and role models. I was fortunate to have strong female role models close to home — especially one remarkable great aunt. In 1950s Portugal, being a working woman was never easy. Yet she persevered. She devoted her life to education, especially to teaching children with special needs.

It is thanks to her and so many other strong and persistent women that we enjoy the progress that we see in Europe today.

At EU level, many of our most prominent institutions are now led by women: the European Commission, the European Parliament, the European Central Bank, and the European Investment Bank. As are many key EU agencies and other important EU bodies such as the European Public Prosecutor’s Office.

There’s no doubt: powerful female role models in public life are essential for a healthy, inclusive democracy. They show the next generation – girls and boys alike – what’s possible. A child who grows up seeing women at the helm of institutions or top companies grows up with a different view of the world, a broader sense of what’s fair, and a deeper understanding of equality.

We can – and should – take pride in the progress we’ve made.

But pride must never turn into complacency.

Yes, it matters that we mark milestones like today. Yes, it matters that we celebrate the achievements of individual women.

But the very fact that we are still marking these moments is also a reminder: the work is not done.

True gender equality means reaching a point where parity in public life is simply expected—where an institution being led by a woman is not newsworthy, not exceptional, but entirely unremarkable.

That is the future we are working toward.

And we are not there yet.

Let me give you a few concrete examples of what I mean.

Thanks to sustained policy effort, the share of women in management within the European Commission has risen dramatically—from very low levels in the early 2000s to near parity today.

And yet, progress remains fragile. It took significant pressure and prolonged negotiations for Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to secure just 11 women among the 27 EU Commissioners.

The picture across our Member States tells a similar story. Nearly two-thirds of ministers – around 65 percent – are still men. And the imbalance is often even greater in national parliaments and regional assemblies.

And inequality is not limited to leadership. Women in the EU continue to earn around 10 percent less than men on average –while still carrying a disproportionate share of unpaid care and household work.

And for too many women, inequality is also about safety. In 2024, nearly one in three women in the EU experienced physical or sexual violence—and never told anyone. That same proportion faced sexual harassment at work.

New technologies have also added another layer of risk. Online, women are disproportionately targeted by sustained, violent, and explicitly gendered abuse.

This is not only a personal tragedy—it is a democratic one. When women in public life withdraw, or decide not to enter public life at all, our public space becomes narrower, less representative, and less capable of serving society as a whole.

So the question is clear: what must we do next?

How do we build on the achievements of the past and the present to create a safer, fairer, more just society for the future—a society where equality is no longer an aspiration, but a lived reality?

From my perspective as European Ombudswoman, there are three key areas we must focus on.

The first is this: we must vigorously enforce and defend the rules we already have.

Europe is not starting from scratch. We have a strong legal foundation. The EU Treaties enshrine human dignity, freedom, and equality as core values. The Charter of Fundamental Rights explicitly prohibits discrimination based on sex and affirms equality between women and men in all areas of life. And we have EU legislation on gender equality in the workplace, parental rights, and work-life balance.

But rules, however strong, are only meaningful if they are implemented, monitored, enforced—and defended.

We must never assume that progress is inevitable. History tells us otherwise. Progress can slow. It can stall. And it can be reversed.

In recent years, we have seen precisely that: a significant rollback of women’s rights in many parts of the world.

This is why the pursuit of gender equality demands constant vigilance.

EU institutions, including the European Commission, have a critical role to play. So do national governments. But so too do ombudsman institutions.

By handling people’s complaints about public administration, ombudsmen are uniquely placed to identify cases of gender discrimination and emerging threats to women’s rights. This helps ensure that gender equality rules do not remain words on paper, but translate into real change in women’s lives.

Cooperation matters too. Through the European Network of Ombudsmen, my Office works alongside more than 100 national and regional ombudsman institutions across Europe to share expertise and strengthen the protection of fundamental rights. Just yesterday, I was in Málaga to mark the launch of the year in which the Network turns 30 – a reminder of the strength that comes from collective action.

I will take this opportunity to quickly but proudly mention that, just like supreme audit institutions, around 40% of the bodies in this Network are now led by women.

The second area we must focus on is representation.

Whether in government, business, or civil society, the presence of women is not optional—it is essential.

If our laws, policies, and decisions are meant to be inclusive, then the way we make them must be inclusive too.

This is not only about who leads our institutions or runs our companies. It is also about who is in the room when ideas are shaped – at meetings, conferences, on television panels, and at the many forums that influence political and public debate.

Not so long ago, all-male expert panels were still a familiar sight in Brussels. After a grassroots online campaign, they suddenly became much rarer. In fact, at times it almost felt as though women had appeared overnight – proof that when there is a will, representation can be found.

That is why we must keep challenging the assumption that it is acceptable for only half the population to be properly represented in discussions that affect us all. Diversity of background is not a sloganit is a prerequisite for better decisions.

Or, as the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg put it so simply and so powerfully: “Women belong in all places where decisions are being made. It shouldn’t be that women are the exception.”

The final area I wish to touch upon is leading by example.

This means looking honestly at our own institutions and asking whether they truly welcome women – and whether they actively support their personal and professional growth.

Leading by example is practical. It means having robust equality policies in place. It means investing in targeted training. It means promoting gender balance at management level. And it means consistently raising awareness about what gender equality really requires in everyday working life.

In my role as European Ombudswoman, I seek not only to ensure that EU institutions promote gender-sensitive policies and address discrimination, but also that my own Office sets a visible standard – one that reflects inclusivity, diversity, and fairness in practice, not just in principle.

And I know that many of you share this responsibility. Each of us, in the institutions we lead, has the opportunity – and the obligation – to make gender equality real, starting at home.

To conclude, there is no doubt that the position of women in Europe today looks very different from that of a generation ago. Barriers have been lowered, opportunities have widened, and leadership spaces, once closed, are increasingly open. These changes are real—and they matter.

But they are not guaranteed. In Europe, many women continue to face discrimination, insecurity, and exclusion in their daily lives – often silently and invisibly.

That is why our task is not only to look forward, but also to remain attentive: to ensure that equality rules are applied fairly, that institutions are accountable, and that women’s voices are heard wherever decisions are taken.

If we remain alert, inclusive, and committed, equality will no longer need to be defended, negotiated, or explained. It will simply be there – rooted in our shared humanity, inseparable from our very existence, and reflected in how our societies live and work.

Thank you for your attention. I look forward to our discussion.

Read more

Link to the Ombudsman Daily News archives from 2002 to 20 October 2011