News from the Ombudsman - March 2025

Date of article: 31/03/2025

Daily News of: 16/04/2025

Country:  United Kingdom - England

Author: Local Government Ombudsmen for England

Article language: en

News from the Ombudsman - March 2025

Welcome...

Welcome to the latest edition of News from the Ombudsman.

In this edition you can read about our:

  • New Chief Executive
  • Talk with Special Educational Needs specialists
  • Contribution to a national consultation
  • New resources to help councils tackle your complaints effectively
  • Latest Good Practice Guide for local authorities
  • Latest annual survey results

We hope you enjoy reading our newsletter. If you'd like to hear more about the work we do, why not follow us on LinkedIn?


Meet our new Chief Executive

Julie Odams

We’re delighted to have appointed Julie Odams as our new Chief Executive Officer.

Julie has been heading up our Policy and Communications team for the last two years and will replace our current CEO, Nigel Ellis, when he retires in early summer.

Appointed following an open recruitment campaign, Julie is looking forward to leading us as we aim to enhance our role in driving improvements in the sectors we oversee and for the increasing number of people who come to us for help.

Read more


Our talk at the SEN Law conference 

Richard Bailey

Our assistant ombudsman, Richard Bailey recently spoke to professionals who work with children and young people with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) at key charity, IPSEA's annual law conference.

Here's what he said:

"I was pleased to have the opportunity to speak at the IPSEA SEN Law Conference in London earlier this month. I spoke about the trends we see in our casework for SEND complaints and in particular the significant rise in complaints we have seen in the past two years.

"I also highlighted our recommendation to Government to expand our powers to enable us to investigate complaints about schools for SEND complaints. We believe the current system of redress is fragmented and causes unnecessary frustration for parents and carers. We continue to argue we should be able to investigate ‘beyond the school gates’."

Read our Triennial Review

 


Standards and Conduct in Local Authorities: our view

The government consultation on how the standards and conduct of councillors should be addressed closed on the 26th February 2025. As an organisation with oversight of local government, and a role in conduct complaints, we contributed our views to the consultation.

The consultation covered the introduction of measures to strengthen the standards and conduct regime in England and ensure consistency of approach amongst councils when investigating serious breaches. It suggested a mandatory code, a requirement for councils to have a Standards Committee, the power to suspend and disqualify councillors and the creation of an appeals body.

We believe that effective, consistent and appropriate conduct by councillors is essential for good local democracy and effective public services. Whilst there is no doubt that the vast majority of England’s approximately 17,000 local councillors operate in line with their organisation’s and the Local Government Association’s voluntary Codes of Conduct, we think it is essential that local and then (where necessary) independent investigation is available to maintain public confidence.

We think there should be a mandatory, and single, Code of Conduct for councillors across England as it would give the public clear and consistent expectations of the standards that should be observed. We also believe that councils should be required to have a Standards Committee and that the Committee should have the power to suspend councillors for serious conduct breaches. We also think there should be a national, independent appeals body to support consistency, transparency and impartiality.

The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government is currently considering the responses to the consultation. We will continue to contribute to discussions on this important area and you can follow developments on the government website.


Free resources to support councils' adoption of our Complaint Handling Code

Complaint file

We have published free training resources for local authorities to support them to adopt our Complaint Handling Code successfully. 

The training is aimed at frontline officers and senior staff who would not normally be suited to our effective complaint handling training course

The resources include a PowerPoint presentation which can be adapted to the relevant audience. The presentation includes a video explaining the Complaint Handling Code and a video explaining how to accept a complaint. The PowerPoint covers our recently published good practice guides and includes an exercise on the difference between a service request and a complaint. 

We ran a webinar for local councils to explain how to use these learning resources. The webinar was attended by more than 200 delegates from 114 local authorities in England.

Many councils in England have already adopted the Complaint Handling Code into local complaints policies and many more are working towards this. We will start applying the Code in our casework from April 2026 and will be updating information we give to the public about raising complaints over the coming year.


Good administrative practice guide relaunched

We have reissued our guidance on the principles of good administrative practice for councils. We have issued this guidance since 1993 and use it as a benchmark for the standards we expect when we investigate complaints about councils.

Six core principles sit at the heart of this document and they explain what we mean by good administration. Our investigations frequently shine a light on the importance of getting the basics right, and on the impact for people’s lives when this goes wrong.

The guidance is issued under our powers to provide guidance to organisations we investigate under section 23(12A) of the 1974 Local Government Act following consultation. We consulted with a range of representative bodies on the updated guidance before publishing it on our website. 

Read the guidance


Feedback from local authorities

In 2024 we asked local authorities to give us feedback on our work through a survey. We received 61 responses to the survey.

We asked authorities to tell us about the impact of our investigations. 75% of those who responded said the Ombudsman’s recommendations were proportionate and in line with our guidance. 86% of respondents said our recommendations had a medium to large impact on improving local public services. 77% of respondents said the Ombudsman had a medium to high impact on national policy and media.


Local elections 2025

Polling station

Many authorities across England will be holding their local elections in May.

Over the coming weeks this will have implications for many people involved in local government. During this 'pre-election period' organisations should not publish any material which might affect the outcome of an election, or compete for media space with those campaigning.

For us, this means that we will not be publishing any critical press releases or public reports about those authorities that are holding an election.

We'll still be issuing our weekly decision bulletins and newsletters as usual.


News you may have missed


Read more

Significant shortcomings in the patient’s post-operative care, failures in the informed consent process and inadequate contract monitoring arrangements in place

Date of article: 08/04/2025

Daily News of: 08/04/2025

Country:  United Kingdom - Wales

Author: Public Services Ombudsman for Wales

Article language: en

oday we publish a new Public Interest report highlighting significant shortcomings in the patient’s post-operative care, failures in the informed consent process and inadequate contract monitoring arrangements in place between Betsi Cadwalader University Health Board and Health Trusts in England.

 

The complaint

We launched an investigation after receiving a complaint from Ms A about the care she received from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board and Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (“the English Trust”) which had been commissioned by the Health Board.

Ms A’s concerns included her management and care following surgery for her inflammatory bowel disease in 2019, whether she was properly consented for surgery in March 2022, as well as postoperative care and treatment, and the handling of her complaint.  Whilst our role and remit covers Welsh NHS bodies, as the Health Board commissioned care from the English Trust, our investigation reviewed the care and treatment which Ms A received from the English Trust on behalf of the Health Board.

 

The findings

Our investigation found multiple failings across various aspects of Ms A’s treatment and care, including failings in colorectal care, and in relation to gynaecological referrals, investigations and treatment undertaken by another English Trust.  This led to Ms A having persistent infection and ill health for nearly 3 years before she received surgical treatment in March 2022.

We found that Ms A did not give informed consent for this surgery – she only signed the consent form on the day of her surgery and there was no record of prior discussion with her of the possibility of her having a hysterectomy during the  surgery.  Although we cannot make definitive findings of a breach of human rights, this failure led to us highlighting that Ms A’s Article 8 rights (the right to respect for private and family life) were potentially engaged.

We were concerned that in its contract monitoring of the commissioned care, the Health Board’s focus and priority was on its financial reporting of the commissioned care and did not include an assessment of the quality of the care and treatment delivered.

“I am mindful of the profound injustice caused to Ms A as a result of the significant failings that have occurred in her case. 

I am extremely concerned about the process by which Ms A gave her “consent” for the surgery in March 2022.  The relevant guidance makes it clear that consent is not simply a matter of completing and signing a form.  Instead, consent is a process which should begin well in advance of the day of the surgery and any discussions should be clearly and separately recorded as part of the consenting process.  This did not happen here. 

This sad case also highlighted the wholly inadequate contract monitoring arrangements in place at the Health Board.  Public bodies must have robust governance arrangements and must ensure that patient safety and the monitoring of the quality of services is in place.

The Health Board’s failure to monitor patient safety and service quality led to it missing crucial opportunities to address poor performance.  With more effective contract monitoring, many of these failings could have been prevented.”

Michelle Morris, the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales.

Our recommendations

We made the following recommendations, which the Health Board has accepted:

  • apologise to Ms A and share the report with relevant Health Board members.
  • request the English Trust to review Ms A’s case, remind clinicians of informed consent and their professional obligations, and share key learnings through a case study of this case.
  • request the Trust’s Surgeon to reflect on the case and discuss improvements to her clinical practice at her next revalidation.
  • seek written assurances from the Trust’s Chief Executive that clinical failings are being addressed and provide compliance evidence to us.
  • Health Board to prioritise, complete and implement a Commissioning Assurance Framework which gives proper consideration to patient safety.
Read more

Council to apologise to Southend mother for not considering her needs as a carer

Date of article: 02/04/2025

Daily News of: 04/04/2025

Country:  United Kingdom - England

Author: Local Government Ombudsmen for England

Article language: en

Southend council has agreed to apologise to a mother for twice failing to assess her needs as a carer despite agreeing to do so in a previous investigation by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.

In the previous complaint, the mother told the Ombudsman Southend-on-Sea City Council had not carried out a parent carer’s assessment when looking at her son’s needs as a disabled child. It agreed to the Ombudsman’s recommendation to assess her needs as a carer.

However, the Ombudsman’s second investigation has found the council did not carry out a proper assessment. It did not consider her needs as a carer, or take into account that the mother herself had disabilities, and instead again focused on her son’s needs.

The Ombudsman also said that when the mother complained to the council, it failed to consider her concerns under the statutory three stage children’s complaints process, as it should have done.

Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, Ms Amerdeep Somal said:

“Southend council failed to conduct a proper assessment of the mother’s needs despite agreeing to do so with my office.

“The assessment it did make, did not properly consider the impact on her mental health and wellbeing of being a carer for a disabled child. This raises my concerns that the council is not fully aware of its duty to ensure both the needs of service users and their carers are fully considered when carrying out combined assessments.

“I have asked the council to carry out some training with its officers about  completing such assessments, and to remind them about those complaints which fall under the Children’s Statutory Complaints Process. I hope this will ensure complaints are dealt with appropriately in future.”

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman remedies injustice and shares learning from investigations to help improve public, and adult social care, services. In this case the council has agreed to apologise to the mother for not carrying out a proper carer’s needs assessment. It will also pay her £1,000 to recognise her distress and the time it has taken to complain twice.

It will also arrange for an independent social worker to carry out a standalone assessment for her.

The Ombudsman has the power to make recommendations to improve processes for the wider public. In this case the council will carry out training on how to conduct a parent carer’s needs assessment and issue a briefing note to all relevant staff detailing complaints that fall within the scope of the statutory children’s complaints procedure.

Read more

Our Quarterly Newsletter November 2024 – March 2025

Date of article: 01/04/2025

Daily News of: 02/04/2025

Country:  United Kingdom - Wales

Author: Public Services Ombudsman for Wales

Article language: en

A word from the Ombudsman, Michelle Morris 

Welcome to the 6th edition of our newsletter. 

We have now completed the second year of our Strategic Plan 2023-26 ‘A New Chapter’. Many actions set out under the Plan have now been delivered and we will continue to work towards our ambitious goals during 2025/26. 

We remain focused on rebuilding the reputation of the office, following the social media incident last year which called our impartiality into question. While an independent review of our investigation of Code of Conduct Complaints found that our decision making was appropriate, fair and free from political bias, it also made recommendations to improve the current safeguards for ensuring fairness and impartiality.   

Over the recent months, our focus has also been on the Finance Committee’s post-legislative review of the Public Services Ombudsman (Wales) Act 2019. The Act requires the Senedd to undertake a post-legislative review as soon as practicable after 21 May 2024 (that is, five years since the 2019 Act received Royal Assent). We have been busy assembling evidence on the impact of our proactive powers to accept complaints other than in writing; undertake investigations on own initiative; and set complaints standards. We have also been invited to speak to the Committee on 30 April. 

In the meantime, we again bring you a quick and easy-to-digest summary of our complaints and improvement work. We are not including in this edition of the newsletter our year-end complaints statistics, as the full details will be available in our Annual Report & Accounts for 2024/25. However, we provide summaries of our recent public interest reports and our Code of Conduct referrals, as well as details of our two recent thematic reports and our complaints standards work. 

It has been a busy year! Despite the challenges, we have a lot to be proud of. We are looking forward to sharing more evidence of our impact in our submission to the Senedd’s Finance Committee as well as discussing all areas of our performance in our next Annual Report.  

[...]

Read more

Scottish Parliament nominates new Ombudsman

Date of article: 01/04/2025

Daily News of: 02/04/2025

Country:  United Kingdom - Scotland

Author: Scottish Public Services Ombudsman

Article language: en

Today, Tuesday 1 April 2025, the Scottish Parliament agreed the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body’s (SPBC) recommendation, that Paul McFadden be appointed Scotland’s fourth Public Services Ombudsman. 

Rosemary Agnew, the current Ombudsman’s, eight-year term ends on 30 April 2025. In the interim until Paul takes up office, Andrew Crawford, a member of the SPSO Senior Leadership Team, will be appointed as the Interim Ombudsman from 1 May 2025. 

Rosemary Agnew said; 

“Congratulations to Paul McFadden. I welcome the announcement and the interim arrangements, as this will ensure there is no break or dip in service for our service users - complainants, whistleblowers, applicants to the Scottish Welfare Fund, and public bodies.”

Read more

Active facets

Link to the Ombudsman Daily News archives from 2002 to 20 October 2011