La síndica de greuges de Cataluña pide que se revisen unos criterios que pueden limitar el acceso al empleo público

Date of article: 11/06/2026

Daily News of: 12/06/2026

Country:  Spain - Catalonia

Author:

Article language: es

Cualquier medida organizativa debe respetar los derechos de las personas y garantizar unas condiciones de acceso abiertas, transparentes y equitativas.
 

La síndica de greuges de Cataluña, Esther Giménez-Salinas, ha dirigido dos resoluciones al Departamento de la Presidencia sobre los procesos de selección y la gestión del personal temporal de la Generalitat. El objetivo es garantizar el derecho de acceso al empleo público en condiciones de igualdad y con respeto a los principios de mérito y capacidad.

Limitaciones a la participación en más de un proceso selectivo

A raíz de una actuación de oficio, la institución analizó una convocatoria de 31 procesos selectivos por limitar la participación. Los candidatos solo podían presentarse a un solo proceso y, en algunos casos, a una sola opción dentro de un mismo cuerpo o escala. Visto esto, la síndica emitió una resolución para pedir que se revisaran de oficio las bases de la convocatoria.

La limitación de la participación restringe el derecho de las personas a acceder a la función pública en igualdad de condiciones. En concreto, si un aspirante cumple los requisitos de diferentes procesos y, por las bases, solo puede presentarse a uno, se está reduciendo la participación real. En cambio, es necesario favorecer la libre concurrencia para seleccionar a los mejores candidatos y, sobre todo, debe garantizarse el derecho fundamental de acceso a la función pública en condiciones de igualdad y de acuerdo con los principios de mérito y capacidad, con la publicidad y la difusión adecuadas.

En la respuesta a la resolución emitida, el Departamento de la Presidencia de la Generalitat justificó su actuación y las restricciones aplicadas. Entre las razones esgrimidas estaban las siguientes: mejorar la eficiencia de los procesos, reducir la temporalidad, adecuar los perfiles profesionales a los puestos de trabajo y evitar la sobrecualificación.

Ahora bien, analizada la respuesta, la síndica no puede compartir la decisión tomada. Aunque considera imprescindible buscar medidas correctoras para las situaciones expuestas, no se puede limitar el derecho fundamental de acceso al empleo público para solucionar temas de política pública en materia de selección de personal o por posibles previsiones de movimientos laborales futuros de las personas aspirantes; de hecho, la rotación de personal se produce ya con los procesos de promoción interna.

Limitaciones a la participación de personal interino en procesos temporales

En una segunda actuación, la síndica emitió una resolución en la que analizaba unos criterios aplicados en ofertas de trabajo temporal. En la práctica, estos criterios desincentivaban la participación de personas que ya habían trabajado como funcionarias interinas en el mismo ámbito, lo cual limitaba el acceso al empleo público para un colectivo que, a menudo, se encuentra en situación de vulnerabilidad.

La Generalitat asegura que esa medida está pensada para prevenir las situaciones de abuso de la temporalidad. Sin embargo, la síndica aduce que no puede considerarse automáticamente como situación de abuso el hecho de que una persona, una vez finalizado un nombramiento temporal, pueda acceder a otro nombramiento temporal bajo la misma dependencia orgánica y funcional. De hecho, este criterio puede perjudicar a las personas que ya han trabajado en la Administración: al terminar su contrato, pueden acabar desempleados porque se les penalice una experiencia laboral concreta en este sentido. 

Cabe recordar que la normativa ya contempla medidas para evitar abusos –como el cese automático una vez transcurridos tres años desde el nombramiento sin que la plaza vacante haya sido convocada– y es necesario analizar cada caso de forma individual.

En definitiva, vistos estos dos casos en los que se han producido limitaciones al acceso al empleo público, la síndica de greuges pide a la Administración que reconsidere los criterios aplicados y que busque alternativas que permitan mejorar la gestión de los procesos selectivos y de la temporalidad sin restringir el acceso de la ciudadanía al empleo público. En cualquier caso, la institución insiste en que cualquier medida organizativa debe respetar los derechos de las personas y garantizar unas condiciones de acceso abiertas, transparentes y equitativas.

Read more

(EO) European Ombudsman 'Award for Good Administration' 2026 - Public vote open until 15 June 2026!

Date of article: 12/06/2026

Daily News of: 12/06/2026

Country:  EUROPE

Author:

Article language: en

The Ombudsman Award for Good Administration is open to projects by teams in any EU institution, body, office, or agency that have had a positive impact on the lives of EU citizens. 

The nomination period closed on 16 January 2026.

Please find the full list of nominated projects here.

The public vote is now open until 15 June 2026 at midnight (CET).

See here for the Award rules of procedure.

Read more

Ombudsperson briefs the responsible parliamentary committee on the situation regarding the Orphan’s and Custody Court situation in Latvia

Date of article: 10/06/2026

Daily News of: 12/06/2026

Country:  Latvia

Author:

Article language: en

On June 9, meeting of Human Rights and Public Affairs Committee of the Parliament (Saeima) of Latvia was held. During this meeting, members of the Committee were presented with a report by the Ombudsperson Karina Palkova regarding the need to review the current institutional model of Orphan’s and Custody court (a municipal institution primarily responsible for protecting the rights and interests of children and incapacitated adults) in Latvia. The Office of the Ombudsman provided an overview of the current situation, the complaints it has received, the shortcomings identified, and recommendations on how to improve the existing system. The Committee expressed its determination to carry out parliamentary oversight of the elaboration and implementation of a new institutional model.

Ombudsperson Karina Palkova: “I would like to express my gratitude to the responsible Committee of the Saeima for their commitment to addressing this issue and their determination to provide parliamentary oversight. It comes as no surprise that certain institutions and organizations, particularly those that will be affected by potential changes, are expressing some caution regarding the proposal to review the current Orphan’s and Custody Court system. However, I urge that the discussions continue and that the obvious problems in this area are addressed, as they affect the lives of so many Latvian children and therefore must not be ignored.”

At the Committee meeting, the majority agreed that the current model of the guardianship court is outdated and does not effectively ensure the protection of children’s rights, as the Orphan’s and Custody Court  also performs functions that are not typically associated with protecting children’s rights, such as notarial functions, custody and representation of persons of legal age in criminal proceedings in criminal proceedings.

For context

On June 4, 2026, the Ombudsperson submitted to the government and the Saeima a report “On the need to review the current institutional model of the Orphan’s and Custody Court .” The report highlights long-standing problems in the work of the Orphan’s and Custody Courts , which is why the Ombudsperson is encouraging the government to develop a new institutional model by December 1 of this year and implement it by January 1, 2028.

The report found that the Orphan’s and Custody Court system in Latvia is structurally fragmented and inconsistent. In Latvia, there exists “one system, but 42 different practices,” as each municipality organizes the work of the guardianship courts differently, including in terms of funding, wages, resource allocation, and procedures.

Supervision of the Orphan’s and Custody Court is insufficient, as its work is monitored by several institutions, yet none of them take full responsibility for the quality of the system. The Orphan’s and Custody Court deals not only with children’s rights issues, but also with not associated work in the field of it, such as notarial, guardianship and other matters unrelated to children. A concerning and significant problem with the current system is that decisions on important human rights issues are often made by people without legal education.

The fact that Orphan’s and Custody Court is made up of several members does not guarantee quality. Therefore, the quality of child rights protection depends on where the child lives, as there are significant differences between municipalities.

The Ombudspersons report proposes two possible approaches for the reform. One model would involve dividing the functions of the guardianship court between the municipal social services and the court. The second model would involve the redistribution of functions between the Child Protection Centre, with branches in local governments, and the courts. At the same time, the Ombudsperson expresses its willingness to discuss other solutions as well, provided they can ensure a higher level of protection for the rights of children and families.

Read more

La justicia de Aragón insta al Departamento de Vivienda a agilizar la tramitación de las ayudas del Bono Alquiler Joven

Date of article: 09/06/2026

Daily News of: 12/06/2026

Country:  Spain - Aragon

Author:

Article language: es

a Institución recuerda que los retrasos prolongados en este tipo de trámites pueden afectar al propósito principal de garantizar la estabilidad habitacional de personas y familias vulnerables

La justicia de Aragón, Concepción Gimeno, ha emitido una sugerencia dirigida al Departamento de Vivienda, Fomento, Logística y Cohesión Territorial para agilizar la tramitación las ayudas del Bono Alquiler Joven. Para ello, la titular considera que cabría valorar cuál es el volumen de recursos materiales y personales asignados a este trámite en relación al número de solicitudes que existen. El Justicia de Aragón ya ha intervenido en asuntos relacionados con las ayudas para el alquiler joven, tramitando expedientes de queja similares, algunos de los cuales culminaron en otras Sugerencias formales.

La última actuación de la institución se produce tras la queja de un interesado que presentó su solicitud de ayuda al alquiler en julio de 2025 y no fue hasta enero de 2026 cuando se le requirió subsanar documentación, estando el trámite todavía en periodo de resoluciones. El propio interesado asegura que entregó el papeleo el mismo día en el que la Administración lo demandó. Sin embargo, se le informó de que su expediente había pasado a última posición en el orden de tramitación de solicitudes.

En la respuesta remitida a esta institución, el Departamento de Vivienda confirma que la solicitud se encuentra en fase de tramitación desde la subsanación de la documentación aportada, lo que significa retomar el proceso de dicha solicitud en el orden correspondiente a la entrega, es decir, enero de 2026. Por todo ello, el Departamento estima que la resolución podría dictarse en las próximas semanas.

La justicia de Aragón recuerda que los retrasos prolongados en esta tramitación y resolución pueden afectar al propósito fundamental de estas ayudas de carácter social, orientadas a garantizar el acceso a una vivienda digna y adecuada para los sectores más jóvenes de la población.

Read more

Communication failures led to wrong treatment that left five-year-old girl traumatised

Date of article: 05/06/2026

Daily News of: 12/06/2026

Country:  United Kingdom

Author:

Article language: en

Effective communication is a critical tool in preventing harm. This has been highlighted in a case where a child was left bleeding and in severe pain after being wrongly prescribed a vaginal pessary following an appointment with a physician associate (PA). 

The case exposed multiple failures in the five-year-old’s care and led to her mother being questioned about possible sexual abuse.  The practice has committed to learn from this complaint and strengthen its systems to prevent the same mistake happening again.

The value of effective communication for public services and its importance in maintaining citizens’ trust and confidence forms a central part of the long-term strategy of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) published in April.  

There was no discussion between the PA and GP before the GP authorised the prescription based on the PA’s recommendation. There was also no questioning of the prescription by the pharmacy that dispensed it.  

The girl was taken to a GP practice in East Midlands in March 2023 with itching and vaginal discharge. A PA suspected thrush and recommended a Clotrimazole vaginal pessary and cream. Her mother, who believed her child was being treated by a GP, questioned the treatment and the size of the pessary, but was reassured that it was appropriate. 

In 2024, the Government commissioned the Leng Review to address concerns about the safety and rapid deployment of PAs and Anaesthesia Associates (AAs) within the NHS. Following the publication of that review last year, the Government accepted its recommendations, including about improving the identification and supervision of PAs. They are in the process of implementing them.  

After the mother administered the pessary, a treatment which should not be given to a pre-pubescent child, the child began to bleed and scream in pain. Her mother described the experience as deeply distressing and psychologically traumatising for them both. The mother says the cream also burnt her daughter’s skin. 

At a later appointment with an out-of-hours doctor, the girl, still in pain and distressed, asked the doctor not to examine her internally. Combined with her symptoms, this led the GP to raise concerns about possible sexual abuse and to have discussions with safeguarding services about this.  

As part of those discussions, a consultant explained that the symptoms were caused by the pessary and cream, not sexual abuse. While the out-of-hours doctor acted appropriately, the mother said the experience was distressing, embarrassing, and further added to her trauma. 

An investigation by PHSO found failings by all involved. The practice inappropriately prescribed the treatment as a pessary should only be given to someone who is sexually active and the pharmacy did not do the necessary clinical checks before dispensing it. 

Rebecca Hilsenrath, Chief Executive Officer of PHSO, said, 

This is a deeply troubling case in which a child suffered physically and psychologically and was left traumatised by her experience. What makes this all the more concerning is that it could so easily have been avoided by better communication between the professionals involved in caring for this young girl. 

 

“The breakdown in communication meant that the checks and balances designed to make sure patients are treated appropriately and kept safe were not followed. Poor communication is a recurring theme in our investigations and the NHS must make sure it operates with candour and clarity both between professionals and in relation to patients and their families. 

 

“I welcome the Government’s commitment through the Leng Review to providing clarity and structure around these roles for the benefit of patients, PAs and doctors.” 

PHSO’s investigation found that the prescription given was not appropriate as the child’s symptoms were consistent with vulvovaginitis, not thrush, and a pessary tablet should not be given to a five-year-old.  

PAs do not have prescribing rights and their work must be supervised by a doctor who signs the prescription following a discussion. No discussion took place between the GP and PA. Pharmacists should contact the prescriber when there are queries relating to a prescription. There is no evidence that the pharmacy did this. 

The Ombudsman recommended that the practice and pharmacy write to the girl’s mother to apologise for their failings and acknowledge the impact on her and her daughter.  

PHSO also recommended both organisations make service changes to ensure this does not happen again, that the practice pay the girl’s mother £1,000 and that the pharmacy pay her £500. Both organisations have complied with our recommendations.

The practice has taken action to strengthen and improve its processes. It introduced an electronic prescribing alert to flag intravaginal pessary prescriptions for children, requiring additional review before authorisation. It also carried out a review of the scope of practice for the PA, particularly in relation to the assessment and treatment of children, taking into account current professional guidance.  

The PA and GP involved underwent additional training to reinforce appropriate prescribing standards and supervision requirements. Processes at the practice have also been strengthened to ensure that supervisory discussions are clearly documented before prescriptions are signed. 

The girl’s mother, 38, said, 

I had huge guilt for doing what the PA, who I thought was a GP, told me and feeling as if I had inflicted this trauma on my daughter.   

 

“But I trusted what the doctor told me. How are we meant to trust healthcare professionals now? The prescription went through three professionals and no one picked it up or questioned why this was being given to a child. 

 

“My daughter is neurodivergent, so it has been even harder for her to move on from the harm this caused. This deeply affected her and added to the struggles she already faces every day, I don’t think she will ever move on from it. 

 

“I have three neurodivergent children and have been battling for them to receive the right education services they need, and then I had to deal with this. It was a breaking point for me and caused so much stress for the whole family.”  

Read more

Link to the Ombudsman Daily News archives from 2002 to 20 October 2011