El Ayuntamiento de Caspe adaptará su normativa para garantizar la accesibilidad universal

Date of article: 30/03/2016

Daily News of: 30/03/2016

Country:  Spain - Aragón

Author: Regional Ombudsman of Aragón

Article language: es

A propuesta del Justicia de Aragón, el Ayuntamiento de Caspe adaptará su Plan General de Ordenación Urbana a las últimas exigencias normativas para garantizar la accesibilidad universal. En concreto, y atendiendo a una reciente Sugerencia del Justiciazgo, este Consistorio modificará los artículos necesarios para que sea posible ocupar el dominio público viario con el fin de facilitar el acceso de las personas con discapacidad a los edificios en los que residan, cuando técnica y económicamente esté justificado.

En su escrito de respuesta a la Sugerencia del Justicia, el Ayuntamiento caspolino acepta la recomendación de la Institución y precisa que realizará las modificaciones pertinentes una vez finalizada en su totalidad la tramitación de la revisión del PGOU, actualmente en marcha.

El Justicia de Aragón, Fernando García Vicente, ha recibido con satisfacción la respuesta del Ayuntamiento de Caspe en la que demuestra una predisposición favorable a cumplir la normativa en beneficio de las personas que tienen movilidad reducida.

Esta Sugerencia del Justicia se enmarca en una actuación de oficio para recabar información de los municipios aragoneses de población superior a 5.000 habitantes sobre su normativa urbanística y la obligación de recoger en ella el artículo 24 del Real Decreto Legislativo 7/2015, con carácter de norma básica, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley de Suelo y Rehabilitación Urbana.

Read more

Tameside MBC publish statement of non-compliance with Ombudsman report

Date of article: 29/03/2016

Daily News of: 30/03/2016

Country:  United Kingdom - England

Author: Local Government Ombudsmen for England

Article language: en

Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council has published a statement in local newspapers stating why it will not be complying with the recommendations of a Local Government Ombudsman report.

In September 2014 we issued a report finding fault with the council which had caused the complainant an injustice, setting out recommendations for remedy. The report was about the payment of top-up fees for a care home.

The council decided not to comply with three of the four recommendations.

Because the council rejected the first report’s findings, we issued a further report in March 2015 calling on the council to remedy the outstanding injustice to the person involved in the complaint.

The council considered the further report, including our recommendations at a council meeting, and again decided not to comply with all the recommendations.

Because the further report has been rejected, the council has been required to publish a statement in the local press detailing why it will not be accepting our recommendations. The council has had the opportunity to challenge the report through the courts.

About statements of non-compliance

The Local Government Ombudsman was set up to support public accountability of local authorities. The results of our investigations are binding, and a finding of maladministration could only be challenged through the High Court. When we find fault that has caused an injustice, we make recommendations for how to put things right.

Each year more than  99.9% of authorities comply with our recommendations. Our legislation, however, means we cannot force them to do so, and the ultimate decision on how to remedy an injustice rests with local democracy.

We will publish a report in the public interest if a council refuses to implement our recommendations, and a further report if the council still fails to put the matter right to our satisfaction. The final stage of the process is that the council must publish a statement of non-compliance to explain to people locally how it has considered our further report and why it has not implemented our recommendations.

Read more

Keine Waisenrente nach Kuba – „Por que“?

Date of article: 26/03/2016

Daily News of: 30/03/2016

Country:  Austria

Author: Austrian Ombudsman Board

Article language: de

Dem Sohn eines verstorbenen österreichischen Pensionisten wurde die Waisenpension per Bescheid von der PVA zwar zugesprochen, die Überweisung der rund 150 Euro scheitert allerdings am US-Embargo gegen Kuba. Die Überweisung sämtlicher österreichischer Pensionen ins Ausland übernimmt durch einen Generalvertrag die Deutsche Post AG. Rund 270.000 Renten, davon rund 4.000 Waisenrenten werden ins Ausland überwiesen.

Im gegenständlichen Fall ergeben sich beim Zahlungsverkehr erhebliche Probleme. Da die Deutsche Post aufgrund bestimmter Maßnahmen vom Handels-, Finanz- und Wirtschaftsembargo der USA gegen Kuba betroffen ist, ist eine Überweisung der Waisenrente an die Mutter des fünfjährigen Kindes nicht möglich. Die Eröffnung eines privaten Kontos in einem anderen Land ist für die Mutter aufgrund der restriktiven Ausreisebestimmungen für Kubaner nicht möglich und laut Volksanwalt Dr. Günther Kräuter auch nicht zumutbar. „Die Waisenrente ist eine Bringschuld der PVA und diese hat für eine ordnungsgemäße Überweisung zu sorgen.“, so der Volksanwalt.

Noch in der Sendung sagte der Vertreter der PVA, Dr. Josef Mair, erfreulicherweise zu, dass die PVA in diesem speziellen Fall eine regelmäßige Direktüberweisung an das Konto der Mutter tätigen wird.

Read more

New report puts GP complaint handling in the spotlight and shows practices how to do it better

Date of article: 18/03/2016

Daily News of: 30/03/2016

Country:  United Kingdom

Author: Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

Article language: en

A new report published today shows that whilst more than half of GP practices are handling complaints well others are falling short, leading to lost opportunities to improve patient care.

The findings in the report are based on a review of 137 complaints about GP practices, which were investigated by the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, NHS England and the Care Quality Commission. Healthwatch England also contributed a survey into patients’ experience of complaining from 31 of its local organisations.

Of the GP surgeries handling complaints well, patients reported satisfaction that their GP made complaining simple and easy, and the practice took their complaints seriously.

The report also sets out areas where GPs should improve their complaint handling, which include poor communication with patients in the course of a complaint, a failure to acknowledge mistakes or apologise when something goes wrong, and a lack of action to make sure the same thing doesn’t happen again.

The report’s key recommendations emphasise that change can only come if everyone works together and focuses on how GP practices should be supported to develop a listening and learning culture.

They include training and education for GPs and staff; help for practices so they can share learning locally from NHS England, clinical commissioning groups and local medical committees; and clarification from medical defence unions to GPs that saying sorry is not an admission of liability.

The report also commits organisations involved in the review to take action to help drive improvements in complaints handling in GP practices.

This includes commitments by:

  • NHS England to continue work with Health Education England and others to ensure that complaints handlers have access to high quality training
  • The Care Quality Commission to continue to investigate complaint handing as part of its inspection programme.
  • Healthwatch England to continue their work to develop a complaints toolkit for local Healthwatch representatives to help suggest improvements to CCGs, GPs and Practice Managers
  • Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman to produce guidance for practices on working with ombudsman

Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Julie Mellor said:

“The 31% uphold rates for GPs is lower than for other parts of the NHS, but it is still vital that GP practices are open to feedback and complaints, in order to bring all practices up to the level of the best.

“GPs are under pressure and need support to deal with complaints. We are pleased that NHS England have committed to ensuring that all practices have staff who are trained to handle complaints, which is essential to provide a good public service.

“We also want clinical commissioning groups, local medical committees and NHS England to share lessons from complaints at a local level.”

 

NHS England Director of Patient Experience, Dr Neil Churchill, said:

“Overall public satisfaction with GPs is high, which is testament to the fantastic work GPs are doing in challenging times.

“However, in cases where feedback is negative, it’s vital that we listen and take action where necessary. 

“That’s why we’ve committed to a number of actions, including providing high quality training for all complaints handlers, and we will soon be announcing a new package of support to further strengthen and invest in primary care."


CQC Chief Inspector of General Practice, Prof Steve Field, said:

"This important report highlights how complaints are an opportunity for GPs and GP surgeries to learn and to improve the quality of care that they provide.

"Patients have every right to feel listened to and reassured that what they report will be acted upon. This is what they deserve and what we look for on our inspections."


Healthwatch England Interim Chair, Jane Mordue, said:

“We know that patients understand the pressures GPs face. We also know that dealing with complaints compassionately can take time, and for many GPs across the country it is time, rather than compassion, that is in short supply. Today’s report reflects some of the challenges but also the opportunities available to improve patient care through learning from complaints.

“Patients have told local Healthwatch that when they experience poor care the first thing they’d like to hear is an apology, so it’s vital that doctors hear the message that saying ‘I’m sorry’ won’t result in legal action.

“Local Healthwatch are ready and willing to work together with GP practices across the country to help doctors, nurses and surgery staff address feedback quickly, appropriately and compassionately, to ensure that mistakes are learnt from and poor experiences aren’t repeated in the future."

 

Notes to editors

1.The 137 cases in the review included 50 from the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, 50 from NHS England and 37 from the Care Quality Commission.

2.The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman makes final decisions on complaints which haven’t been resolved locally by the NHS in England and UK government departments and other UK public organisations.

3. For more information please contact Steven Mather on 0300 061 4324 or email steven.mather@ombudsman.org.uk, or Marina Soteriou on 0300 061 4996 marina.soteriou@ombudsman.org.uk

4. For out-of-hours media enquiries, please contact the duty press officer on 0300 061 4444.

 

Read more