Fences around a farm as possible interference with the appearance of the landscape

Date of article: 17/10/2017

Daily News of: 07/12/2017

Country:  Czechia

Author:

Article language: en

A married couple turned to the ombudsman in a case involving the procedure of authorities (the Nature Conservation Body, the Construction Authority) in connection to granting permission to fence a fallow deer farm on their land.

The deputy-ombudsman's inquiry confirmed that the complainants had started the construction works on the fences without an appropriate permit by the Construction Authority (as well as at variance with the spatial plan), which necessarily had had to lead to proceedings on removal of the structure. The deputy critically noted that the proceedings on removal of a structure had not required the spatial planning process, and if the Construction Authority had stayed the proceedings on such grounds, its procedure had been wrong. If, after the expiry of the period for which the procedure for the removal of the structure had been stayed, the proceedings remained open for a long time, then the Construction Authority erred by being inactive.

The authorities reflected the criticised shortcomings in the current procedures, took steps against the inactivity, and promised to further act in accordance with the legal requirements. According to the current reports from the authorities, the administrative proceedings regarding the construction of the fences around the farm have not been closed by a final decision, and the complainants are parties to the proceeding, with all rights following from it, which they also actively exercise. The deputy-ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry.

 

Read more

Ombudswoman Brinek holds speech at ACUNS-Symposium on the topic “Violence against elderly women”

Date of article: 07/12/2017

Daily News of: 07/12/2017

Country:  Austria

Author:

Article language: en

On 24 November 2017 and on the occasion of the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, Ombudswoman Dr. Brinek took part in the symposium on “Violence against elderly women”, hosted by ACUNS (Academic Council of the United Nations System) at the Vienna International City.

A wide range of topics were addressed in the podium discussion about violence against elderly women in more traditional cultural contexts, as well as on a familial and at an institutional level of police and medicine. Ombudswoman Brinek focused on two central issues which are often overlooked when speaking of women’s rights issues: old-age poverty of women and legal guardianship. She underlined the fact that old-age poverty of women is a problem deeply rooted in society, which is only reinforced through the following of traditional gender roles since women have no real choice of whether to stay with their children or to continue working. Either way, they are in danger of being affected by old-age poverty later on.

When speaking of legal guardianship, Ombudswoman Brinek referred to the alarming number of complaints brought to the Austrian Ombudsman Board on this issue every year. Through her dedication to raising awareness to this topic and provoking a change in legislation, she has worked closely together with relevant organizations and a working group of the Federal Ministry of Justice. The new Adults Protection Law which will enter into force in July 2018 aims to bring about more empowerment and support for affected persons, instead of encouraging incapacitation. Hence, a decrease in complaints concerning legal guardianship is hoped for.

According to Ombudswoman Brinek, “Even with these small successes, our work of improving the situation for women in this world is never done. Violence against elderly women remains a wide-spread phenomenon which must be addressed to raise a wider awareness of this issue.”

 

Read more

Volksanwältin Brinek hält Rede bei ACUNS-Symposium zum Thema „Gewalt gegen ältere Frauen“

Date of article: 07/12/2017

Daily News of: 07/12/2017

Country:  Austria

Author:

Article language: de

Am 24. November 2017 nahm Volksanwältin Dr. Brinek zum Anlass des Internationalen Tages zur Beseitigung von Gewalt gegen Frauen am von ACUNS (Academic Council of the United Nations System) organisierten Symposium zum Thema „Gewalt gegen ältere Frauen“ in der Vienna International City teil.

In der Podiumsdiskussion wurde über Themen der Gewalt gegen ältere Frauen in traditionelleren Kulturkreisen, auf familiärer und institutioneller Ebene der Polizei und der Medizin gesprochen. Volksanwältin Brinek fokussierte sich auf zwei Themen, die in diesem Kontext oft übersehen werden: Altersarmut und Sachwalterschaft. Dabei betonte sie, dass traditionelle Geschlechterrollenbilder in unserer Gesellschaft noch immer verankert sind. Für Frauen bestehe eigentlich keine Wahlfreiheit, da sie auch wenn sie nicht bei den Kindern bleiben sondern weiter erwerbstätig sind, in der Pension weniger verdienen als Männer und somit gefährdet sind in die Altersarmut zu fallen.

Zum Thema Sachwalterschaft sprach Volksanwältin Brinek von einer hohen Zahl von Beschwerdefällen, die jedes Jahr an die Volksanwaltschaft herangetragen werden. Durch ihren Einsatz für eine Veränderung des Sachwalterschaft-Gesetzes, in Zusammenarbeit mit verschiedenen Organisationen die sich mit diesem Thema befassen und einer Arbeitsgruppe des Justizministeriums, wurde vor kurzem ein neues Erwachsenenschutzgesetz beschlossen, welches im Juli 2018 in Kraft treten wird. Mehr Unterstützung statt Entmündigung und eine Reduzierung der Beschwerden über Sachwalterschafts-Angelegenheiten werden dadurch erhofft.

„Auch mit solchen kleinen Erfolgen ist unsere Arbeit in der Verbesserung der Situation von Frauen in dieser Welt nie getan. Gewalt gegen ältere Frauen bleibt ein weitverbreitetes Phänomen, welches immer wieder angesprochen werden muss um ein größeres Bewusstsein zu diesem Themas zu schaffen“, so Volksanwältin Brinek.

 

Read more

"We have the same rights": ENNHRI’s project leads the way to a human rights-based approach to long-term care in Europe

Date of article: 02/12/2017

Daily News of: 07/12/2017

Country:  Lithuania

Author:

Article language: en

By presenting the findings of the monitoring team of Lithuania, Mr. Vytautas Valentinavičius, Chief Counsellor of the Seimas Ombudsmen’s Office, raised concerns, for example those related to upholding dignity, the right to privacy, autonomy, participation and access to justice in residential long-term care settings for older persons of Lithuania. Moreover, examples of concerning practices which coincided with those in some of the countries included entry to residential LTC without consent, unsafe environments for the residents and overall the greater challenges upholding human rights

The project’s monitoring work was carried out by NHRIs in Belgium, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania and Romania, in residential long-term care settings for older persons; the findings showed that most care workers instinctively used a person-centred approach to inform their work, valuing older care users as individuals, respecting their dignity and independence, and understanding the value of social interaction.

As well as summarising the key findings from the project, which comes to an end in December 2017, the conference offered further guidance to policy-makers, care providers and advocates for older persons on implementing a human rights- based approach in the long-term care (LTC) sector and protecting and promoting the rights of older persons in (or seeking) care.

The use of formal LTC throughout Europe varies widely. On average, LTC costs in the EU are about 1.7% of GDP (2013), ranging from 0.3% in Slovakia and Cyprus to 4.1% in Netherlands. The average expenditure is expected to increase by as much as 2.3 percentage points of GDP (to 4% of GDP). ”We need to make sure that the very real pressure in relation to supply and cost means that quality and human rights don’t get shifted off the agenda”, explained Ciara O’Dwyer, Project Co-ordinator.

As Heinz Becker, MEP, remarked, this topic is about “solidarity between generations”. Ana Carla Pereira of European Commission’s Directorate for Employment and Social Affairs mentioned that it important to look at it not only from a social perspective, as there will be 12 million people needing LTC in Europe in a few years.“ LTC sector in Europe is highly diverse and Human Rights are central to its future development” she concluded.

ENNHRI’s report analysed these national findings to identify key trends in the human rights situation relating to LTC in Europe; these can also form a solid basis for the upcoming discussions on the long term-care agenda of the European Commission.

The event brought together actors from across wider Europe responsible for planning and delivering long-term care for older persons, including representatives of NHRIS, policy-makers, care providers; advocates for older persons and persons with disabilities, human rights defenders, as well as older persons and their families.

“We, NHRIs, are really indeed determined to work with people in long term care - there is so much to be done in our national environment, and I hope that we keep this momentum for the future” concluded ENNHRI Chair, Lora Vidović.

Read more

Régime d’asile européen : le Défenseur des droits dénonce une proposition de loi qui permet de priver de liberté les demandeurs d’asile

Date of article: 07/12/2017

Daily News of: 07/12/2017

Country:  France

Author:

Article language: fr

Le Défenseur des droits, Jacques Toubon, fait part de son inquiétude sur la  » qui s’apprête à être discutée à l’Assemblée nationale ce jour. Il a présenté des observations à la Commission des lois dès le 29 novembre.

Cette proposition de loi permet de placer en centre de rétention administrative certains demandeurs d’asile soumis au règlement « Dublin », avant toute décision d’éloignement.

Le texte adopté par la Commission des lois rend, certes, la proposition formellement plus conforme au droit européen. Le Règlement « Dublin » et la Directive « Accueil » du 26 juin 2013 permettent en effet ce placement en rétention s’il existe un risque de fuite des intéressés et sous réserve de l’examen de leur situation individuelle.

Néanmoins, le projet constitue un tournant politique déplorable en termes de respect des droits et des libertés fondamentales.

Ce serait, en effet, la première fois que la France décide de mettre en œuvre dans sa législation les mesures les plus restrictives du règlement européen en matière de libertés individuelles et de droits fondamentaux des demandeurs d’asile. Le Défenseur des droits rappelle qu’il a, au contraire, recommandé la suspension de ce mécanisme, le jugeant intrinsèquement inéquitable au détriment des Etats frontières. Comme le montre la proposition en discussion, l’application du règlement est, en outre, susceptible d’autoriser des restrictions disproportionnées au droit de ne pas être détenu arbitrairement.

Il opère avant tout un changement total de philosophie : en France, seules des personnes en situation irrégulière peuvent être placées en centre de rétention administrative et uniquement dans le but d’exécuter une décision d’éloignement, pour le temps strictement nécessaire à leur départ, et si l’éloignement demeure une perspective raisonnable. C’est tout le sens de l’ensemble des décisions du Conseil constitutionnel depuis 1980.

Si ce texte était adopté, des personnes en situation régulière pourraient désormais être privées de liberté, en l’absence de toute décision d’éloignement et sans que cet éloignement ne soit vraisemblablement possible.

Cela conduirait à banaliser l’enfermement des étrangers, y compris ceux ayant un droit au maintien sur le territoire et en besoin de protection internationale, au mépris du respect des droits fondamentaux les plus élémentaires.

 

Read more