Questa mattina Marino Fardelli in qualità di Presidente del Coordinamento Nazionale dei Difensori Civici Italiani e Difensore Civico del Lazio, ha avuto una interlocuzione telefonica per dare il più caloroso benvenuto alla nuova collega, Veronika Meyer, eletta nei giorni scorsi nuova Difensore Civico della Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano.

La conversazione telefonica ha avuto l’opportunità di discutere e condividere le tematiche affrontate nell’ultimo incontro del Coordinamento Nazionale e informare la collega sulle prossime iniziative pianificate e sulle attività in corso.

“Attendiamo con grande interesse l’opportunità di incontrare la collega – hanno affermato Marino Fardelli insieme ai vice Presidenti Marcello Pecorari e Antonia Fiordelisi – di persona durante le nostre prossime riunioni. Nel frattempo, esprimiamo i migliori auguri per il suo nuovo incarico e le diamo il benvenuto nel nostro gruppo di difensori civici”.

Link: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2024-04/cp240076de.pdf

Languages available: bg es cs da de et el en fr hr ga it lv lt hu mt nl pl pt ro sk sl fi sv

PRESSEMITTEILUNG Nr. 76/24

Luxemburg, den 30. April 2024

Urteil des Gerichtshofs in der Rechtssache C-178/22 | Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bolzano

Privatleben und Verfolgung schwerer Straftaten: Das Gericht, das für die Genehmigung des Zugangs zu Telefonverbindungsdaten zur Ermittlung der Täter einer Straftat zuständig ist, für deren Verfolgung das nationale Recht einen solchen Zugang vorsieht, muss befugt sein, diesen Zugang zu verweigern oder einzuschränken

Nach italienischem Recht gehört der schwere Diebstahl zu den Straftaten, die es rechtfertigen, dass nach vorheriger richterlicher Genehmigung von einem Betreiber elektronischer Kommunikationsdienste Telefonverbindungsdaten erlangt werden. Der Gerichtshof ist der Ansicht, dass der Zugang zu solchen Daten nur in Bezug auf Daten von Personen gewährt werden darf, die im Verdacht stehen, in eine schwere Straftat verwickelt zu sein, und stellt klar, dass es Sache der Mitgliedstaaten ist, die „schweren Straftaten“ zu definieren. Allerdings muss das für die Genehmigung dieses Zugangs zuständige Gericht befugt sein, diesen Zugang zu verweigern oder einzuschränken, wenn es feststellt, dass der durch den Zugang verursachte Eingriff in die Grundrechte auf Achtung des Privatlebens und auf Schutz personenbezogener Daten einen schweren Eingriff darstellt, und demgegenüber offensichtlich ist, dass es sich bei der betreffenden Straftat angesichts der im betreffenden Mitgliedstaat vorherrschenden gesellschaftlichen Bedingungen nicht um eine schwere Straftat handelt. (...)

Link:

Languages:

PRESS RELEASE No 77/24

Luxembourg, 30 April 2024

Judgment of the Court in Case C-670/22 | M.N. (EncroChat)

EncroChat: the Court of Justice clarifies the conditions for the transmission and use of evidence in criminal cases with a cross-border dimension

In the context of criminal proceedings in Germany concerning illegal drug trafficking involving the use of the encrypted telecommunications service EncroChat, the Court of Justice clarifies certain conditions for the transmission and use of evidence under the Directive regarding the European Investigation Order (EIO) in criminal matters.

Thus, an EIO for the transmission of evidence already gathered by another Member State may, under certain conditions, be issued by a public prosecutor. The conditions applicable to the gathering of evidence in the issuing State do not need to have been satisfied in order for the EIO to be issued. It must, however, be possible for compliance with the fundamental rights of the persons concerned to be judicially reviewed subsequently. Moreover, an interception measure carried out by one Member State on the territory of another Member State must be notified in good time to that other Member State. The criminal courts must, under certain conditions, disregard evidence when the person concerned is not in a position to comment on that evidence. (...)

A colleague from our Integrity Centre took part in the annual meeting of the European network NEIWA, which took place in Valencia. The network brings together 33 organizations from 24 different countries that are committed on improving the integrity  and protection of whistleblowers and taking a stand against corruption. 

During several workshops, participants shared their knowledge and experience. The outcome of the meeting was the "Valencia Declaration", in which they highlighted the importance of whistleblowing.

"Whistleblowing is the best tool in the fight against corruption" say the members of the network in their Declaration. In the Declaration, they also condemn any form of suppression or limitation of the independence and efficiency of integrity and whistleblowing authorities. 

NEIWA members highlighted the importance of strengthening the work and coordination of all actors involved in the field of whistleblowing and the fight against corruption such as police and justice but also the civil society, as their contribution is essential for the establishment of a “Speak up” culture

A major issue for the network is the European Directive on the protection protection of whistleblowers, which has since been implemented in several European countries, including Belgium. Paul Hafellner, Legal Officer in the Fundamental Rights was invited to this meeting and made a presentation on the status of the transposition of the European Directive on the protection of whistleblowers of corruption. 

Finally, the network decided to admit new members, including Ombudsman of Wallonia (Belgium) and the Federal Institute of Human Rights (Belgium).