Severe criticism of the Prison and Probation Service, Borås Remand Prison, for not respecting inmates’ right of association, etc.

Date of article: 20/05/2024

Daily News of: 21/05/2024

Country:  Sweden

Author: Parliamentary Ombudsmen of Sweden

Article language: en

Date of decision: 2024-02-29Decision case number: 7437-2022Decision maker: Ombudsman

Over a period totalling around two months, a remand prisoner who was neither subject to restrictions nor placed in segregation was only allowed to spend time with other inmates in a common area on average once a week and had the opportunity to walk for one hour a day with a group of other inmates. The Parliamentary Ombudsman states that those measures do not satisfy the inmate’s right of association in accordance with the Remand Prison Act. The remand prison receives severe criticism for this.

The Parliamentary Ombudsman also makes certain statements setting the requirement of see page double occupancy as a condition for spending time with others and stresses that it is worrying if an inmate refrains from a measure designed to break isolation such as this on the grounds that it may lead to him or her having to share a cell with another inmate.

In the decision, the Parliamentary Ombudsman sets out the basic rules on inmates’ right of association and the applicable rules for those who are subject to restrictions or placed in segregation.

Date of decision: 2024-02-29

Read more

El Defensor del Pueblo andaluz y la Cámara de Cuentas de Andalucía estrechan su colaboración

Date of article: 20/05/2024

Daily News of: 21/05/2024

Country:  Spain - Andalucía

Author: Regional Ombudsman of Andalucía

Article language: es

El Defensor del Pueblo andaluz, Jesús Maeztu, y el presidente de la Cámara de Cuentas de Andalucía, Manuel Alejandro Cardenete, han mantenido hoy una reunión institucional en la sede del Defensor con el objetivo de estrechar la colaboración necesaria entre ambos comisionados parlamentarios.

La cooperación entre ambas instituciones contribuye a una gestión más transparente y eficaz de los asuntos que afectan a la ciudadanía andaluza. Entre los informes recientes de la Cámara de Cuentas de Andalucía se encuentran los relacionados con la Renta Mínima de Inserción Social; con las medidas Covid del sector servicios de atención residencial o con la fiscalización de la gestión de la valoración de las personas con discapacidad, entre otros asuntos de interés para ambas instituciones.

Read more

Child Friendly Complaints

Date of article: 20/05/2024

Daily News of: 21/05/2024

Country:  United Kingdom - Scotland

Author: Scottish Public Services Ombudsman

Article language: en

Ensuring children’s rights and needs are met by public service complaints procedures in Scotland

May 2024 - Submission of Child Friendly Complaints Handling Principles to Parliament

Following the completion of the public consultation on the draft Child Friendly Complaints Handling Principles, we carried out detailed analysis and made a number of amendments based on the consultation responses and feedback. The resulting version of the Principles has now been submitted to the Scottish Parliament for approval. You can find and download a copy of that version below, though please note this may be subject to change following parliamentary comment and scrutiny. 

Once approved, the final version of the Principles will become part of our wider Statement of Principles, which all public bodies under our jurisdiction must ensure their complaints procedures comply with.

View the Child Friendly Complaints Handling Principles (PDF, 113KB).

January 2024 -  Consultation on Draft Child Friendly Complaints Handling Principles

Note this consultation is now closed.

Our consultation on the draft Child Friendly Complaints Handling Principles is now open, and we are accepting responses until 1 March 2024. The purpose of this consultation is to gather responses on the current drafts, to ensure they are clearly communicated and easy to understand. This consultation is also a legal requirement, as we will be looking to amend our Statement of Principles to include the Child Friendly Complaints Handling Principles in the next few months, following parliamentary approval. 

The consultation is open to all, but we are particularly looking for responses from:

  • Anyone under 18
  • Anyone with caring responsibilities for someone under 18
  • Public services and third sector organisations who work with people under 18 or have an interest in promoting their rights 

The consultation questionnaire only takes about 10 minutes to complete. It can be found here: Consultation on Child Friendly Complaints Handling Principles

Alternatively, you can download and complete a word version of the consultation (Word, 30.4KB) and submit this to ISE-CSA@spso.gov.scot.


June 2023 - Pilot of Draft Child Friendly Complaints Guidance

Following an extensive co-design project with a wide range of children, young people, and other stakeholders, we have now launched a pilot of a draft version of the new approach to handling complaints involving children. This consists of two key guidance documents - the Child Friendly Complaints Handling Principles, and a Child Friendly Complaints Handling Procedure.

The purpose of the pilot is to test the new approach in a real world setting, to ensure it achieves the goal of meeting children's rights and needs, and to identify any changes required or improvements that may be beneficial. The pilot is open to any public body under our jurisdiction, to trial and test the new process at a scope and scale that they feel is appropriate and manageable, with the SPSO available to support that implementation and answer any questions that may arise during the handling of a complaint.

If your organisation would like to learn more about the draft guidance, or would like to take part in the pilot, please contact us at ISE-CSA@spso.gov.scot and we will be happy to help.


December 2022

The SPSO is currently working on a new approach to handling complaints that involve children. We are doing this by working with children & young people from a range of backgrounds, and from across Scotland, to co-design this new approach and ensure it is a system fit for purpose. We have also enlisted the help of a wide range of parents, advocates, and professionals that work with children in the public sector, to test and refine the approach and ensure it will work in a practical setting. We would like to extend our sincere gratitude and thanks to everyone who has helped us in this work so far.

We now have a first draft of a guide that will ultimately be implemented by all public bodies under our remit. This guide will set out how existing complaints processes can be adapted when a child or young person is involved. It will aim to ensure that their rights under the UNCRC are met throughout the complaints process and that their concerns are handled in a way that they have told us meets their needs.

We had initially planned to carry out a public consultation around now, aiming towards publishing the guide under our model complaints powers and requiring all relevant public bodies to have their own version in place by 1 April 2023. Following feedback from our engagement and testing work, we have decided to carry out a more targeted pilot first.

The pilot will focus on key services provided to children and young people, such as schools, social work services, and children’s health services. The aim of this work will be to test the new approach in practical settings, both to ensure it results in the right outcomes for children, and that it is efficient, practical and workable for the public sector bodies managing the process.

We will still hold a full public consultation before publication of the final guidance, but this will now take place after the pilots are complete and any changes made. We are still in the process of refining the pilot, and will provide further updates on the timeline and launch when we have definite dates. We will also be aiming to share further details of the approach before the 1 April 2023, so that all relevant bodies, including those not involved in the pilot, will have a better understanding of what to expect.

If your organisation would like to be involved, or you would like further information about what your involvement might entail, please contact us at CSA@spso.gov.scot and we will do our best to help.


July 2022

The SPSO is being funded by the Scottish Government to develop a child-friendly way for public bodies to handle complaints. On 25 April 2022 we launched our two-year project to develop and implement new guidance for the public bodies we work with.

Children and young people are users of a wide range of Scottish public services, including schools, children and families social work, and health visitor services. Many of these focus on wellbeing, health and development. Children have the right to complain if they are unhappy with those services.

We are developing guidance that will cover complaints about public services:

  • made by children and young people themselves
  • made on behalf of children and young people with their permission (e.g. by their parents, carers or third-party advocates), and
  • concerning children and young people (e.g. made by their parents, carers or third-party advocates without permission or input from children and young people).

Project aim

Co-design and implement a public sector complaints service that meets children’s rights and needs, working in co-operation with children and young people, public bodies and wider stakeholders

It is important that complaints handling processes both enable children and young people to exercise their rights, and ensure those handling complaints hear and respect children and young peoples’ views and voices. Taking a co-design approach that hears those voices from the outset will help ensure young people have a real impact in shaping the new guidance.


Timescales

We will be running design workshops with a wide range of people over the next few months.  If you would like to take part in our workshops, or if you have any questions about the project, please contact us by emailing CSA@spso.gov.scot.  


Downloads

Read more

The Ombudsman meets the Italian Ambassador to Malta

Date of article: 20/05/2024

Daily News of: 21/05/2024

Country:  Malta

Author: National Ombudsman of Malta

Article language: en

The Ombudsman, Judge Emeritus Joseph Zammit McKeon, received a courtesy call from the Ambassador of Italy to Malta, H.E. Fabrizio Romano.

The Ombudsman began the meeting by welcoming the Ambassador and explaining that such meetings with the Diplomatic Corps of prominent communities in Malta highlight that the Office of the Ombudsman serves not only Maltese citizens but also every person who might feel aggrieved by the Maltese public administration, including Italian nationals.

The Ambassador thanked the Ombudsman and explained that the Italian Embassy in Malta sometimes acts as a bridge with public authorities when encountering difficulties with the public administration. The opportunity to resort to the Ombudsman when these efforts do not succeed is an added avenue for resolving grievances.

The Ombudsman took the opportunity to update the Ambassador about the 13th World Conference of the International Ombudsman Institute, which he recently attended at The Hague, and explained the role of the Malta Ombudsman in both the European Regional Board and the World Board. The Ombudsman noted that during the week-long conference and meetings, the Office of the Ombudsman explored collaboration methods with counterpart institutions.

The meeting concluded with both parties commenting on the excellent long-standing relations between both countries and their people.

Read more

Statement – Terms of Reference: Independent Review of PSOW’s Investigation of Code of Conduct Complaints

Date of article: 20/05/2024

Daily News of: 21/05/2024

Country:  United Kingdom - Wales

Author: Public Services Ombudsman for Wales

Article language: en

The Public Services Ombudsman, Michelle Morris, is today publishing the final Terms of Reference for the independent review of the Ombudsman’s Councillor Code of Conduct work.  The review will be conducted to provide assurance that its processes, for considering complaints that councillors have breached the councillor Code of Conduct, are sound and free from political bias.  It will also identify lessons that can be learned from what has happened.

Terms of Reference: Independent Review of PSOW’s Investigation of Code of Conduct Complaints

Background

The office of the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales was established in April 2006 by the Public Services Ombudsman (Wales) Act 2005.  In 2019 this Act was repealed and replaced by the Public Services Ombudsman (Wales) 2019 Act (“The 2019 Act”).  The appointment of ‘Ombudsman’ is made by the Crown and the current Ombudsman, Michelle Morris has been in post since April 2022.

The role of the PSOW is to: 1) look into complaints that something has gone wrong with Welsh public services; 2) look into complaints that Welsh councillors have breached their Code of Conduct; and 3) work with public bodies to improve public services and standards of conduct within local government across Wales.

Context

On 26 March 2024, the PSOW was informed by a member of the public that a member of staff (herein referred to as the “Former Team Leader”) had been making inappropriate and unacceptable social media posts of a political nature.

The Former Team Leader was suspended on 29 March 2024 and resigned from her role with PSOW on 3 April 2024.  The Former Team Leader had been, until the end of August 2023, leading the Code Team assessing and investigating complaints that local councillors had breached the Code of Conduct for councillors in accordance with the Local Government Act 2000 (‘LGA 2000’).

Scope and Purpose of the Review

The purpose of the independent review is to look at the PSOW’s processes for the assessment and investigation of complaints that members of local authorities, fire and rescue authorities, national park authorities and police and crime panels in Wales have breached their Code of Conduct.  The aim of this review is to provide assurance as to whether the PSOW’s code of conduct processes, delegations and decisions in relation to the assessment and investigation of such complaints have been sound, free from political bias[1] and that lessons are learned from what has happened.

While there is currently no evidence that the Former Team Leader expressed her personal views or influenced others in the office, PSOW recognises that any review also needs to provide assurance on the Former Team Leader’s decision-making and potential influence on others. There is no intention for this review to reassess cases afresh or to reopen cases.

Code of Conduct complaints which are not investigated

From 1 April 2021 onwards, the Code Team was responsible for the assessment of Code of Conduct complaints and making decisions on which complaints should not be investigated.  Prior to this date these assessments were made in a different team which was not managed by the Former Team Leader.

On 1 September 2023, as happens from time to time in accordance with the operational needs of the office, the PSOW rotated team leaders and the Former Team Leader moved to manage a different team in PSOW.  On this occasion, the rotation occurred as a result of the retirement of a team leader who managed a Public Service Complaints Investigation Team.

From 1 September 2023 until 22 October 2023, the Code Team had no team leader, pending the new team leader taking up this role on 23 October.  During the time when no team leader was in position, a more senior manager oversaw the work of the Code of Conduct Team.  She was, from time to time, assisted by the Former Team Leader.

This review will consider assessment decisions taken by the Former Team Leader and the Code Team from 1 April 2021 until 22 October 2023.

The PSOW applies a two stage test when deciding whether a complaint should be investigated.  Firstly, whether the evidence provided suggests that a breach of the Code of Conduct has occurred, and, secondly, whether an investigation is required in the public interest.

As the Former Team Leader did not manage the Team which took assessment decisions on Code of Conduct cases before 1 April 2021, this review will not consider assessment decisions taken before 1 April 2021.

Code of Conduct complaints – cases which are investigated

Decisions to start an investigation under section 69 of the LGA 2000 are taken by the Director of Investigations/Chief Legal Adviser.

Decisions to discontinue an investigation before its completion are taken by the Director of Investigations/Chief Legal Adviser.

On completion of an investigation, the PSOW’s role is to decide which of the following findings under s69(4) of the LGA 2000 is appropriate:

(a) that there is no evidence of any failure to comply with the code of conduct

(b) that no action needs to be taken in respect of the matters which are the subject of the investigation

(c) that the matters which are the subject of the investigation should be referred to the monitoring officer of the relevant authority concerned for consideration by its standards committee, or

(d) that the matters which are the subject of the investigation should be referred to the president of the Adjudication Panel for Wales for adjudication by a tribunal.

Decisions that there is no evidence of a breach of the Code (as outlined in (a) above) or that no action needs to be taken in respect of the matters investigated (as outlined in (b) above) are taken by the Director of Investigations/Chief Legal Adviser.

Cases which the Former Team Leader investigated during the period from 1 April 2019 (when the Former Team Leader became responsible for the oversight of Code of Conduct ­­work) until 23 October 2023 and which the Former Team Leader either decided to discontinue or close because there was no evidence of a failure to comply with the code or no action needed to be taken, will be considered as part of this review.  Although the Former Team Leader did not make the final decision on these cases, all cases which the Former Team Leader investigated whilst in a management role overseeing Code of Conduct casework for PSOW, will be considered as part of this review.

Decisions to refer a matter for hearing to a standards committee or the Adjudication Panel for Wales under ( c ) or (d) above, are taken by the Ombudsman.

These cases are then subject to an independent hearing, in which the investigation may be challenged and scrutinised and witnesses may be called before the relevant standards committee or Adjudication Panel for Wales reaches a decision on whether the councillor complained about has breached the Code of Conduct, and if so, whether a sanction should be imposed.

A councillor may appeal against decisions taken by a standards committee to the Adjudication Panel for Wales.

A councillor may appeal against decisions taken by the Adjudication Panel for Wales to the High Court.

The Adjudication Panel for Wales and standards committees are independent of the Ombudsman and take decisions on cases independently of the Ombudsman. Cases referred to either a standards committee or the Adjudication Panel for Wales have already been reviewed by those bodies. Decisions of those bodies are appealable: that is there is a statutory mechanism in place which allows a councillor subject to a decision of those bodies to seek a further review of those decisions. The Ombudsman has no power to alter a decision of a standards committee or the Adjudication Panel for Wales. The only way in which such decisions can be challenged or altered is via the statutory appeal process. Accordingly, the review will not include these cases.

Lead Reviewer

Dr Melissa McCullough

Melissa McCullough is the Commissioner for Standards for the Northern Ireland Assembly (since 2020) and also the Commissioner for Standards for the Jersey and Guernsey States Assemblies (since March 2023). Melissa moved to Belfast from the United States in 1994 and obtained a PhD from Queen’s University Belfast, Faculty of Medicine in 1997.  She has worked as an academic in law, ethics and professionalism in the UK and Ireland since 2005. Melissa also holds the Advanced Professional Certificate in Investigative Practice, a Master’s degree in Bioethics and Applied Ethics and a Bachelor of Laws degree. Melissa served as ministerial appointed non-executive director on the Health and Social Care Board in Northern Ireland from 2009 until 2020 and is currently a member of the BMJ Ethics Committee.

Review Team

Mr John Devitt

John Devitt is a Senior Policing Oversight Specialist & Independent Professional Investigator. John is a former Scotland Yard Detective and Senior Investigator for the Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland.  John has extensive major crime investigation knowledge and experience.  He has over his long career undertaken some of the most challenging, complex and sensitive investigations nationally and internationally.  John currently sits as an Advisory Panel Member for the charity Inside Justice which reviews and investigates alleged miscarriages of justice. John also supports the Northern Ireland Assembly Commissioner for Standards with her ethics and standards current case work.  He has been a member of the Institute of Professional Investigators since 1992.

Mr Shane McAteer

Shane McAteer is the Clerk of Standards at the Northern Ireland Assembly and has worked as a senior public official for over 20 years, with experience in supporting the development and scrutiny of public policy and legislation and in providing procedural advice, policy analysis and professional support to elected representatives. Shane has particular experience in advising elected representatives on Code of Conduct requirements and in supporting the adjudication of complaints against elected representatives. He has expertise in conduct/workplace investigation and holds the Advanced Professional Certificate in Investigative Practice. In addition, Shane has prior experience as a Third Sector CEO.

Evidence Gathering

The Review Team will each be provided access to the case management database. Aside from what is available on the case management database, the Review Team will also gather any and all written correspondence, documentation, and communications relating and relevant to the scope and purpose of the review including email, telephone, digital and hard copy information. The Review team may deem it necessary to interview team members and staff and other relevant thirds parties as may become apparent throughout the review.

Deliverables

The Ombudsman has appointed Melissa McCullough to lead this independent review and report on their findings.

The PSOW considers that Dr McCullough should have a wide scope for comment and should seek to:

  1. Review the PSOW’s Code of Conduct processes and delegations to ensure that they are appropriate, fair and impartial and free from political bias.
  2. Review the decisions taken by the former team leader and her Team not to investigate Code of Conduct complaints from 1 April 2021 to 22 October 2023, to ensure that the PSOW’s two stage test was applied properly and decisions were free from political bias (673 cases).
  3. Review cases where the former team leader was the ‘case owner’ which were investigated and closed without a referral to a standards committee or the Adjudication Panel for Wales from 1 April 2019 to 22 October 2023, to ensure that there is no evidence of political bias in the handling of these cases (11 cases).
  4. Establish whether there is evidence that the team leader expressed her personal views on political matters akin to her social media posts in the office and/or inappropriately influenced other staff members, in the performance of their duties under the Local Government Act 2000.
  5. Make any recommendations which Dr McCullough considers appropriate and issue a final report which the PSOW will share with the Senedd’s Finance Committee. In the event that Dr McCullough considers it necessary to widen the scope of this review, she will inform and agree this with the Ombudsman.

[1] For the purposes of this review, political bias will be found where there is evidence that the decision on a case was influenced by the political affiliation of the person who made the complaint and/or the member who was complained about.

Read more