Councils and NHS need to work more closely to improve local care

Date of article: 18/07/2024

Daily News of: 22/07/2024

Country:  United Kingdom

Author: Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

Article language: en

Integrated Care Systems are not doing enough to put the vulnerable people they support at the heart of what they do, according to a new report issued jointly by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman and the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.

Integrated Care Systems (ICS) are organisations made up of representatives from local authority social services and NHS partnerships that work together to support the needs of people in their areas.

However, complaints investigated jointly by both Ombudsman schemes suggest people are being let down by poor communication between services.

The new report details some of things that can and do go wrong when people are not prioritised and local organisations do not work together effectively. Cases include a boy with medical and Special Educational Needs who lost six years of education while his parents struggled to look after him because support could not be agreed. In another case a family caring for a loved one with progressing dementia were not provided with the proper practical support and advice in the final months of her life.

And in another case, a young child with complex medical and care needs spent years without the appropriate overnight care he needed while his local council and medical services argued about who should fund the support.

The report includes a recommendation for ICSs to agree a ‘person first approach’ where councils and health services work together to look at how needs can be met as their first priority. It also suggests that councils and health services agree standard frameworks for effective communication, focused on ensuring professionals on the frontline interact effectively and record all discussions and decisions.

Ms Amerdeep Somal, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said:

“Local authorities and the NHS need to work as equal partners to put people at the heart of their services on every occasion. However, we are finding cases where disagreements about responsibility and funding are having a significant impact on people’s quality of life.

“When working well, Integrated Care Systems should create real improvements to services, but we are finding children and adults’ health and education compromised because the organisations meant to serve them don’t collaborate effectively.

“Our report provides an opportunity for ICSs to learn from the case studies it contains, and consider the recommendations we set out to improve the way they work together.”

Rebecca Hilsenrath, Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, said:

“Individuals and families who draw on health and care services are not aware of organisational boundaries and should not need to be. The NHS and local authorities should already be working together to provide the best possible care for those who need it. But we know that is not always the case and people in vulnerable circumstances are suffering the consequences.

"ICS leaders must implement change and learn from past failings. The recommendations in this report will help leaders scrutinise local practice and ensure the needs of local people are put at the centre of services.”

The report has been produced using insight from the LGSCO/ PHSO Joint Working Team, which carries out single investigations on complaints covering issues that span both Ombudsman scheme jurisdictions of health and social care services.

Read more

Monthly brief from the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights

Date of article: 18/07/2024

Daily News of: 22/07/2024

Country:  Ukraine

Author: Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights

Article language: en

(Exerpt from issue n°5, 2024)

OMBUDSPERSONS OF TWO COUNTRIES BRING UKRAINE CLOSER TO EU INTEGRATION!

In May, the Ombudsman of Ukraine, Mr. Dmytro Lubinets, and the Ombudsman of Romania, Ms. Renate Weber, visited the two countries together. The goal was to exchange information and experience on the observance of the rights of national communities in Ukraine and Romania, which is one of the issues on Ukraine’s path to EU integration

OBSERVANCE OF RIGHTS OF NATIONAL MINORITIES IS A PRIORITY!

In June 2023, the Commissioner initiated a pilot project to document members of the Roma national minority in Zakarpattia. It is part of the Council of Europe project «Support to Reforms of the Legal Framework for National Minorities and Resilience of National Minorities and Roma in Ukraine».

With the cooperation of all participants in the pilot project (both state authorities and civil society*), representatives of the Roma national minority who have not received a passport of a citizen of Ukraine for one reason or another are being documented.

In the first half of 2024, joint efforts were made to:

█ collect and process dossiers on 302 members of the Roma national community;

█ 76 people were documented with passports of Ukrainian citizens. !The documentation process is still ongoing and requires further targeted work

(The full brief is available on demand at the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights)

Read more

Councils and NHS need to work more closely to improve local care

Date of article: 18/07/2024

Daily News of: 22/07/2024

Country:  United Kingdom - England

Author: Local Government Ombudsmen for England

Article language: en

Councils and NHS need to work more closely to improve local care

Integrated Care Systems are not doing enough to put the vulnerable people they support at the heart of what they do, according to a new report issued jointly by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman and the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.

Integrated Care Systems (ICS) are organisations made up of representatives from local authority social services and NHS partnerships that work together to support the needs of people in their areas.

However, complaints investigated jointly by both Ombudsman schemes suggest people are being let down by poor communication between services.

The new report details some of the things that can and do go wrong when people are not prioritised and local organisations do not work together effectively. Cases include a boy with medical and Special Educational Needs who lost six years of education while his parents struggled to look after him because support could not be agreed. In another case a family caring for a loved one with progressing dementia were not provided with the proper practical support and advice in the final months of her life.

And in another case, a young child with complex medical and care needs spent years without the appropriate overnight care he needed while his local council and medical services argued about who should fund the support.

The report includes a recommendation for ICSs to agree a ‘person first approach’ where councils and health services work together to look at how needs can be met as their first priority. It also suggests that councils and health services agree standard frameworks for effective communication, focused on ensuring professionals on the frontline interact effectively and record all discussions and decisions.

Ms Amerdeep Somal, Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, said:

“Local authorities and the NHS need to work as equal partners to put people at the heart of their services on every occasion. However, we are finding cases where disagreements about responsibility and funding are having a significant impact on people’s quality of life.

“When working well, Integrated Care Systems should create real improvements to services, but we are finding children and adults’ health and education compromised because the organisations meant to serve them don’t collaborate effectively.

“Our report provides an opportunity for ICSs to learn from the case studies it contains, and consider the recommendations we set out to improve the way they work together.”

Rebecca Hilsenrath, Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman, said:

“Individuals and families who draw on health and care services are not aware of organisational boundaries and should not need to be. The NHS and local authorities should already be working together to provide the best possible care for those who need it. But we know that is not always the case and people in vulnerable circumstances are suffering the consequences.

"ICS leaders must implement change and learn from past failings. The recommendations in this report will help leaders scrutinise local practice and ensure the needs of local people are put at the centre of services.”

The report has been produced using insight from the LGSCO/ PHSO Joint Working Team, which carries out single investigations on complaints covering issues that span both Ombudsman scheme jurisdictions of health and social care services.

You can download the report at https://www.lgo.org.uk/information-centre/reports/focus-reports

Article date: 18 July 2024

Read more

Cancer Patient Denied Potentially Curative Surgery By Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

Date of article: 18/07/2024

Daily News of: 22/07/2024

Country:  United Kingdom - Wales

Author: Public Services Ombudsman for Wales

Article language: en

A cancer patient in care of Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board was denied potentially curative surgery and had a biopsy done privately due to an unacceptable delay in the Health Board being able to undertake this procedure, according to latest report by the Public Services Ombudsman for Wales.

The Complaint

The Ombudsman launched an investigation after Mrs B complained about the care and treatment her husband, Mr B, received from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board.

In April 2022, Mr B went to the Emergency Department at Wrexham Maelor Hospital with urinary retention. The Ombudsman’s investigation considered:

  1. whether Mr B’s symptoms should have led to an urgent suspected cancer referral;
  2. whether the Health Board’s management of Mr B’s care, between April 2022 and February 2023, was clinically appropriate and in line with the suspected cancer pathway;
  3. if the Health Board’s communication with Mr and Mrs B, including sharing information about investigations and treatment plans, during this time was appropriate;
  4. if the likely waiting time for a biopsy in August 2022 was reasonable;
  5. the Health Board’s complaint handling of this case.

What the Ombudsman found

Whilst there were elements of Mr B’s care that were clinically appropriate, including the treatment he received when he attended the Emergency Department in April 2022, the Ombudsman found that Mr B had been denied potentially curative surgery.

The decision not to offer surgery was based on the view his prostate cancer had spread, yet, there was uncertainty about whether this was the case. As a result, the Ombudsman concluded that he should have been offered surgery. Mr B should have had the opportunity to discuss his complex investigation results and treatment plan with a senior clinician.

The Ombudsman also found that Mr B’s treatment fell significantly outside the suspected cancer pathway target time of 62 days from suspicion of cancer to treatment. Mr B chose to have a biopsy done privately due to the unacceptable delay in the Health Board being able to undertake this procedure.

Finally, the Ombudsman’s investigation revealed failings in the Health Board’s complaint handling of this case.

“It is of real concern to me that this is the third time my office is highlighting concerns about the Health Board’s delivery of treatment for prostate cancer over recent years. Whilst my report notes the ongoing actions outlined by the Health Board, it is concerning that the urology service provision, in particular in relation to prostate cancer, continues to be a problem for the Health Board.

My predecessor received assurance from the Health Board that it was “grasping the nettle”. However, the similarity of the concerns in this complaint raises questions about whether the Health Board’s actions have been effective in improving the service. I urge the Health Board to fully commit to change and improvement so people do not have cause to approach my office again with similar concerns.”

Commenting on the report, Public Services Ombudsman for Wales, Michelle Morris, said:

The Ombudsman’s Recommendations

The Ombudsman recommended that Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board should apologise to Mr and Mrs B and pay them £6,850 to reimburse costs they incurred, for the injustice caused to Mr B and in recognition of the time and trouble Mrs B had to go to making the complaint.

In addition, the Ombudsman recommended that the Health Board should:

  • Share her report with relevant clinicians.
  • Review its complaint handling of this case.
  • Summarise actions taken and progress made against the remedial actions and recommendations, following internal and external reviews.

Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board has accepted the Ombudsman’s findings and conclusions and has agreed to implement these recommendations.

In light of the concerns identified in this investigation, the Ombudsman’s report will be shared with HIW for it to take into consideration when planning its future work in this area.

 

To read the full report, click here:

 
Read more

Judgment of the General Court in Case T-1077/23 | Bytedance v Commission

Date of article: 17/07/2024

Daily News of: 22/07/2024

Country:  EUROPE

Author: Court of Justice of the European Union

Article language: en

Link: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2024-07/cp240114en.pdf

Languages available: es de en fr it hu nl pl pt

PRESS RELEASE No 114/24

Luxembourg, 17 July 2024

Judgment of the General Court in Case T-1077/23 | Bytedance v Commission

Digital Markets Act: The General Court dismisses the action brought by Bytedance (TikTok) against the decision of the Commission designating it as a gatekeeper

Bytedance Ltd is a company which, via its subsidiaries, provides the online social networking platform TikTok. By decision of 5 September 2023, the Commission designated Bytedance as a gatekeeper pursuant to the Digital Markets Act (DMA) 1 . In November 2023, Bytedance brought an action for annulment of that decision. The Court, at Bytedance's request, decided to rule on the present case under the expedited procedure.

By today’s judgment, delivered eight months after the action was brought, the Court dismisses Bytedance’s action.

The Court first recalled the legislative history and content of the DMA. It notably emphasised that the EU legislature decided to adopt the DMA in order, inter alia, to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by laying down rules to ensure the contestability and fairness of markets in the digital sector in general, and for business users and end users of core platform services provided by gatekeepers in particular.

(...)

Read more