Zero tolerance for severe forms of labour exploitation needed, FRA study says

Date of article: 02/06/2015

Daily News of: 02/06/2015

Country:  EUROPE

Author: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights

Article language: en

Consumers are often unaware that the food they eat or the clothes they buy may have been produced by people working under conditions of severe labour exploitation. A new report by the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) shows that while the EU has legislation prohibiting certain forms of severe labour exploitation, workers moving within or migrating to the EU are at risk of becoming victims.

Access report: Severe labour exploitation: workers moving within or into the European Union >>

Despite this, the offence of employing a migrant worker under particularly exploitative working conditions is punishable in some EU Member States with a maximum sentence of less than two years,a penalty that does not reflect the gravity of the fundamental rights violations involved.

"The exploitation of workers who have been forced by their economic and social circumstances to agree to substandard working conditions is unacceptable," said FRA interim Director Constantinos Manolopoulos. "We are talking here about an endemic problem that we must take urgent action to end. EU Member States need to make a greater effort to promote a climate of zero tolerance for severe forms of labour exploitation and take steps to monitor the situation more effectively and sanction perpetrators."

FRA’s new report is the first of its kind to comprehensively explore all criminal forms of labour exploitation in the EU affecting workers moving within or into the EU. The findings show that criminal labour exploitation is extensive in a number of industries, particularly agriculture, construction, hotel and catering, domestic work, and manufacturing, and also that perpetrators are at little risk of prosecution or of having to compensate victims. This situation does not only harm the victims themselves, but also undermines labour standards more broadly.

While exploited workers are spread across different geographical locations and sectors of the economy, they often have much in common, such as very low wages – sometimes of €1 per hour or less – and working days of 12 hours or more for six or even seven days a week. One important factor contributing to the present situation of widespread impunity is a lack of reporting by victims, who are either prevented from doing so or do not wish to come forward for fear of losing their job.

Among proposals FRA makes in the report to improve the situation are the following:

  • EU Member States must ensure a comprehensive, effective and well-resourced system of workplace inspections.
  • To improve the effectiveness of investigations into cases of severe labour exploitation, close links should be established between the police, public prosecutors and monitoring authorities such as labour inspectorates, support services, and employers’ associations, also in cross-border contexts.
  • Victims’ access to justice needs to be strengthened, e.g. through greater efforts to make victims aware of their rights, both before and after their arrival in the EU country in which they are working.
  • National authorities need to establish trust and provide a sense of safety, security and protection to encourage exploited workers to report their experiences, while labour inspectorates and police should cooperate more closely to ensure they identify cases of severe labour exploitation wherever they occur.
  • Both private companies and national authorities are called on to ensure they avoid supporting labour exploitation by contracting or subcontracting companies involved in the exploitation of workers.
  • Consumers must be informed of the risks that a product or service offered was created involving severe labour exploitation by such means as a system of certification and branding of products of companies that respect workers’ rights.

The full report is available in the press pack:

Severe Labour Exploitation >>

FRA publications on related issues can be found at the links below:

Victims of crime in the EU: the extent and nature of support for victims (report) 
Fundamental rights at Europe’s southern sea borders (report)
Migrants in an irregular situation employed in domestic work: Fundamental rights challenges for the European Union and its Member States (report)
Criminalisation of migrants in an irregular situation (paper)
Legal entry channels to the EU (paper)

For further information please contact: media@fra.europa.eu
Tel.: +43 1 580 30 642

Notes to editors:

  • Field research for this report was carried out in 21 EU countries, while research into the legal and institutional framework of severe labour exploitation was conducted in all 28 Member States.
  • FRA conducted a total of 616 expert interviews with professional groups involved in the field of labour exploitation, including labour inspectorates, the police, judges, representatives of workers and employers, national policy experts, and recruitment agency staff.
  • No victims were interviewed for this report. However, FRA will shortly be starting work on a follow-up project that will interview workers who have experienced or are at risk of labour exploitation in the EU.
  • FRA is mandated to provide evidence-based advice to EU and national decision makers, thereby contributing to more informed and targeted fundamental rights policy.

 

Read more

FRA report on the criminal labour exploitation of workers moving within or migrating to the EU

Date of article: 02/06/2015

Daily News of: 02/06/2015

Country:  Hungary

Author: Office of the Commissioner for Fundamental Rights of Hungary

Article language: en

On 2 June 2015, the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) will publish the findings of its research into the criminal labour exploitation of workers moving within or migrating to the EU. The report is the first to comprehensively explore all criminal forms of labour exploitation in the EU of workers moving within or into the EU, and shows that despite legislation banning the practice, labour exploitation is widespread in the EU.

The report suggests that EU Member States should take a zero tolerance attitude by measures such as sanctioning companies that exploit workers and considering a system of certification allowing consumers to identify products and services that have not involved any form of labour exploitation.

Field research for the report was carried out in 21 EU countries, while research into the legal and institutional framework of severe labour exploitation was conducted in all 28 Member States. FRA conducted a total of 616 expert interviews and 24 focus group discussions with professionals in the field of labour exploitation, including labour inspectorates, the police, judges, national policy experts, and recruitment agency staff.

Some key findings from the expert interviews:

•  Severe labour exploitation is pervasive in a number of sectors, including agriculture, construction, the hotel and catering industry, domestic work, and manufacturing.

•  A lack of workplace inspections and monitoring of working conditions, coupled with ineffective investigations, lead to a situation of widespread impunity: offenders are at little risk of prosecution, punishment or the necessity of having to compensate exploited workers, a situation exacerbated by underreporting.

•  The main reasons for victims not to report exploitation are a fear of deportation, a lack of rights awareness, and fear of retaliation against themselves or family members.

•  The majority of consumers are not aware that products they buy or use may be the result of labour exploitation as there is no system of binding standards or clear branding.

The report, together with the press release and other information material, can be found in the press pack, which is available on the FRA website.

Read more

Evacuation du campement de migrants à Paris, boulevard de la Chapelle : le Défenseur des droits demande des garanties

Date of article: 02/06/2015

Daily News of: 02/06/2015

Country:  France

Author: National Ombudsman of France

Article language: fr

Le Défenseur des droits, Jacques Toubon, suit avec attention la situation des migrants dont le campement a été évacué ce matin par les forces de l’ordre  à Paris dans le Xe arrondissement.

Il partage les préoccupations des pouvoirs publics sur les risques, notamment sanitaires, encourus par ces hommes, ces femmes et ces enfants qui, depuis plusieurs mois vivaient dans la rue.

Le caractère humanitaire de cette intervention doit s’accompagner de la mise en œuvre de toutes les garanties de protection des droits fondamentaux auxquelles peuvent légitimement prétendre ces personnes, notamment celles qui ont vocation à demander l’asile. Jacques Toubon souhaite que des mesures pérennes soient mises en place pour assurer l’hébergement et la santé de ces migrants et que leurs situations administratives soient étudiées dans les meilleurs délais.

Le Défenseur des droits, à la lumière des situations analogues que l’on peut constater dans Paris ou à Calais, relève que le défi auquel notre pays et d’autres pays européens sont confrontés ne saurait être durablement traité par la voie de simples mesures d’urgence ponctuelles et locales.

 

Read more

COMUNICADO sobre los despidos colectivos de empleados públicos

Date of article: 02/06/2015

Daily News of: 02/06/2015

Country:  Spain - Andalucía

Author: Regional Ombudsman of Andalucía

Article language: es

El citado artículo 35.3 del Reglamento introduce dos criterios para determinar si se da el supuesto de hecho de la insuficiencia presupuestaria exigida por el Estatuto laboral: el déficit presupuestario de la Administración Pública de referencia en el ejercicio anterior, y la minoración de créditos en un 5 por ciento en el ejercicio corriente o en un por ciento en los dos ejercicios anteriores. Desde la perspectiva judicial ambos criterios pueden reflejar situaciones de insuficiencia presupuestaria, o lo que es lo mismo, situaciones en que la entidad pública no dispone de una previsión de ingresos suficiente para hacer frente a los servicios públicos que tiene encomendados.

Matiza la sentencia, que lo que la norma legal de referencia (Disposición adicional vigésima del Estatuto de los Trabajadores) configura como causa justificativa del despido colectiva no es la mera insuficiencia presupuestaria, sino la “insuficiencia presupuestaria sobrevenida y persistente”.

Para el Tribunal Supremo, esta adjetivación se omite en el art. 35.3 del Reglamento y, sobre todo, este precepto reglamentario no responde a la exigencia legal de que la insuficiencia presupuestaria sea persistente. A su entender el simple déficit presupuestario de la Administración Pública de referencia en el ejercicio anterior no implica forzosamente tal persistencia; y en cuanto a la minoración de créditos, aun cuando pueda a veces ser indicio de dicha situación, no conduce ineluctablemente a ella.

Desde esta perspectiva judicial este criterio reglamentario supone una desviación del criterio legal, consistente en un dato material o sustantivo -como es la imposibilidad de financiar los servicios públicos encomendados- sustituyéndolo por un dato puramente formal.

La misma sentencia anula también el apartado primero de la Disposición final segunda del Real Decreto 1483/2012 (que modifica el Real Decreto 625/1985, por el que se desarrolla la Ley 31/1984, de 2 de agosto, de protección por desempleo), que encomienda la comunicación de las medidas de despido colectivo a la entidad gestora de las prestaciones por desempleo a la empresa, cuando el Estatuto de los Trabajadores y la Ley de la Seguridad Social establecen que debe hacerlo la autoridad laboral. El Supremo no considera de por sí ilegal atribuir ese deber de comunicación a la empresa, pero sin suprimir el deber de comunicación que las leyes atribuyen a la autoridad laboral.

 

Read more

El Diputado del Común asiste a la reunión de coordinación de defensores en Santiago

Date of article: 02/06/2015

Daily News of: 02/06/2015

Country:  Spain - Canary Islands

Author: Regional Ombudsman of the Canary Islands

Article language: es

El valedor do pobo, José Julio Fernández, preside hoy en Santiago una reunión de trabajo de todos los defensores españoles, a la que asiste el Diputado del Común junto a otros titulares de las defensorías del País Vasco, Cataluña, Andalucía, Castilla León, Navarra, y adjuntos del Defensor del Pueblo, del Síndic de Valencia y representantes del Justicia de Aragón participan en el Parlamento de Galicia desde esta mañana en una reunión ordinaria de coordinación.
 

A primera hora los defensores fueron recibidos por la presidenta del Parlamento de Galicia. Durante la jornada de hoy tratarán asuntos relacionados con la actividad ordinaria de las instituciones, buscando, como resulta habitual, canales de cooperación en la resolución de las quejas y abordaje de problemas idénticos que plantea la ciudadanía.

Read more