1/2017 : 10 janvier 2017 - Arrêt du Tribunal dans l'affaire T-577/14

Date of article: 10/01/2017

Daily News of: 10/01/2017

Country:  EUROPE

Author:

Article language: fr

Gascogne Sack Deutschland et Gascogne / Union
Droit institutionnel
L’Union européenne est condamnée à verser plus de 50 000 euros de dommages-intérêts aux sociétés Gascogne Sack Deutschland et Gascogne en raison d’une durée excessive de la procédure devant le Tribunal de l’UE

Read more

Excellente année 2017 !

Date of article: 10/01/2017

Daily News of: 10/01/2017

Country:  Belgium - Wallonia and Federation of Wallonia-Brussels

Author:

Article language: fr

Nous vous souhaitons une excellente année 2017! Plus que jamais, le Médiateur et son équipe sont à votre disposition et au service de la collectivité.

10-01-2017

Read more

1/2017 : 10 January 2017 - Judgment of the General Court in case T-577/14

Date of article: 10/01/2017

Daily News of: 10/01/2017

Country:  EUROPE

Author:

Article language: en

Gascogne Sack Deutschland and Gascogne v Union
Law governing the institutions
The EU is ordered to pay more than €50 000 in damages to the companies Gascogne Sack Deutschland and Gascogne as a result of the excessive length of the proceedings before the General Court

Read more

The court agreed with the CHR and ordered the German TV station to publish an apology for using the term „Polish death camps”

Date of article: 22/12/2016

Daily News of: 09/01/2017

Country:  Poland

Author:

Article language: en

The Court of Appeal in Kraków thoroughly agreed with the CHR’s argumentation and ordered the German TV station ZDF to publish an apology to Mr Karol Tendera for using the term “Polish death camps”. The Court pointed that the term’s use in relation to the Auschwitz prisoner may suggest he was not a victim but a perpetrator.

In the opinion of the Commissioner for Human Rights, the previous apology by ZDF was inadequate. Given that the claimant was offended in public, on a commonly accessible website, an apology in the form of a letter addressed only and directly to him (via his legal representative) was insufficient

 

Read more